Author: Colby Guffey
Planning Unit: Clinton County CES
Major Program: Forages
Plan of Work: Livestock, Poultry, & Crops
Outcome: Initial Outcome
The problem
Producer pulled soil samples for a pasture field to receive fertilizer recommendations. After discussion with producer, upon delivering the results and fertilizer recommendations it was discovered that they had only pulled a few cores and in the "bad" areas of the field. The fertilizer recommendation was very high in regard to what would normally be recommended for pastures.
The educational program response
The producer was educated on the importance of pulling a good representative sample at the correct depth for the pasture.
The participants/target audience
Beef cow/calf producer
Other partners (if applicable)
Program impact or participant response.
The producer re-pulled a good representative sample of the pasture field, and sent to UK soils lab for analysis. The soil analysis from the "good' sample revealed all areas of fertility were in the sufficient range for forage production resulting in a huge savings for the producer as opposed to applying fertilizer based on the "bad" soil sample as Nitrogen was the only nutrient needed for forage production in this case.
The Twin Lakes Cattle Association partnered with Clinton County Extension Service ANR Agent and UK E... Read More
The ANR Agent helped enroll a cooperating producer in the cereal rye project being conducted by UK E... Read More
Clinton County Cooperative Extension has stepped up to the plate again this year with helping our co... Read More
Clinton County 4-H has been able to help with with Field Day at the Clinton County Middle School for... Read More