Adair County CES

County Emphasis:

Developing Productive Citizens

Concentration 1:

Building Leadership Capacity

Concentration 2:

Work and Life Skill Development

Concentration 3:

Financial Security and Economic Well-Being

Concentration 4:

Family and Youth Development

Situation:

Leadership is critical at several levels, from elected officials and internal management structure of organizations to project managers, team leaders, and those who inspire throughout a community. Thriving communities may require many leaders willing to take on leadership roles. And yet, it can be a challenge to identify new leaders or to encourage leaders to step up to the role without first building leadership capacity (CEDIK 2024). Respondents participating in the University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Community Needs Assessment identified the need to build leadership capacity to enhance individual and family development and community and economic development. Kentucky has a statewide need to “prepare community members for formal/informal leadership and/or volunteer roles” and to build “capacity of local nonprofits and community leaders,” according to the survey. UK Extension aims to work on strengthening critical leadership skills and confidence for new and emerging leaders so that the pool of willing and capable leaders can rise to match local needs. Volunteer training can have motivational benefits ranging from inspiring volunteers to get more involved to keeping them in the program (Fox, Hebert, Martin & Bairnsfather, 2009).

Youth Focus

4-H opportunities profoundly impact individuals and communities in Kentucky by equipping youth with essential skills like communication, teamwork, and problem-solving, fostering personal leadership, and community engagement. Skills like analytical thinking, creative thinking, resilience, flexibility, and adaptability are key to future employment (World Economic Forum, 2023). 77% of employers say that there should be less focus on traditional school subjects and more focus on real-world skills (Kauffman Foundation, 2021). In the 2023 University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service Needs Assessment youth life skill training opportunities (such as leadership and communication skill opportunities), strengthening youth workforce readiness, and strengthening youth-adult or mentorship relationships were top priorities across Kentucky. According to the National 4-H Annual Index Survey (2024), 95% of youth identified their strengths through 4-H, 80% explored career options, and 50% received guidance for college decisions. Additionally, 75% enjoyed helping their community, and 93% felt inspired by 4-H, with 42% being inspired “a lot” to volunteer. These experiences build leadership capacity, promote civic engagement, and create connected, resilient communities by encouraging critical thinking and empathy. Furthermore, 4-H offers life skill training, strengthens youth workforce readiness, fosters mentorship, maximizes youth voice in important issues, and enhances peer-peer relationships.

 

Kentucky household income statistics are concerning, with the median household income in Kentucky on a downward trend (i.e., approximately $55,100, which is 74% of the U.S. median income). Most alarming, it is estimated that nearly 62% of Kentucky households do not generate sufficient income to meet living wage standards given the state’s average cost of living. The Kentucky Center for Business and Economic Research (2024) projects that, “a key for Kentucky’s future economic growth is to identify and successfully implement programs that increase the employment-population ratio, particularly for working-age adults.” The University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service (CES) is committed to improving the work and life skill development of adults across the Commonwealth by offering programming designed to increase the human capital of constituents. This includes providing education and training on topics such as workforce preparation, job readiness, financial literacy, soft skills, and professionalism, among others.

In a 2023 University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Community Needs Assessment, with nearly 28,000 responses from across the state, Building Employee Soft Skills (e.g., communication, productivity, and teamwork skills) and Building Life Skills of Community Members were among the top ten Individual and Family Development Needs reported by Kentuckians.

Youth Focus

America’s future hinges on a prepared workforce and engaged communities collaborating to tackle society’s most pressing challenges. As of 2024, there are 2,465,949 job openings in Kentucky and nationwide, there are 10 million unfilled jobs. Fastest growing jobs are in the fields of vocational education and higher education teachers, agriculture professionals, and digitally enabled roles: e-commerce specialists, digital transformation specialists, and digital marketing professionals (World Economic Forum, 2023). 85% of the jobs that will exist in 2030 haven’t been invented yet (Dell Technologies, 2019). 77% of employers say to focus less on traditional school subjects, more on real-world skills (Kauffman Foundation, 2021). Skills like analytical thinking, creative thinking, resilience, flexibility, and adaptability are key (World Economic Forum, 2023). According to the National 4-H Index Study 2024, 80% explored career options, 50% received guidance for college decisions, and 95% reported that 4-H helped them identify things they were good at. To ensure a sustainable society, it is crucial that our youth are equipped to fill these positions. The University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension System Community Needs Assessment (2023) has identified key priority issues related to life skill development for young people. These priorities include youth life skill training opportunities, youth workforce readiness, and maximizing youth voice in matters that directly impact them. Empowering our youth to actively participate in addressing societal issues is essential for a thriving future

County Situation:

Based on the 2024 University of Kentucky Extension Community Needs Assessment, a significant need exists in Adair County to enhance leadership development and life/work skills, impacting both youth and adults. Here's a breakdown of the situation:

County Needs Situation: Leadership Development and Life/Work Skills

For Youth:

1. Situation: The assessment indicates a gap in opportunities for youth to develop essential leadership skills, such as effective communication, problem-solving, and teamwork. This lack of development can hinder their ability to succeed in academic, social, and future professional settings. Additionally, there's a need for stronger life skills education, including financial literacy, decision-making, and conflict resolution, to prepare them for the challenges of adolescence and adulthood.
2. Contributing Factors: Limited access to youth leadership programs, lack of school-based life skills curricula, and insufficient community resources may contribute to this situation.
3. Consequences: Youth may experience difficulties in navigating social situations, making sound choices, and assuming leadership roles. This can lead to decreased civic engagement, lower educational attainment, and increased risk of negative outcomes.

For Adults:

1. Situation: The assessment also highlights a need for adults to enhance their leadership and life/work skills. Many adults require stronger leadership abilities to contribute effectively in their workplaces and communities. Furthermore, there's a demand for improved skills in areas like financial management, technology, and adaptability, which are crucial for economic stability and career advancement in a rapidly changing world.
2. Contributing Factors: Limited access to affordable professional development, lack of employer-sponsored training, and challenges in balancing work and family responsibilities may hinder adults from acquiring these skills.
3. Consequences: Adults may face challenges in securing and maintaining employment, advancing in their careers, and participating in community leadership. This can lead to economic hardship, reduced community capacity, and decreased overall quality of life.

Long-Term Outcomes:

Leadership

Adult

 

1. Strong leadership pool for community boards and organizations
2. Strong boards and organizations accomplish more in the community
3. Increased community pride or investment
4. Improved local economy
5. Improved quality of life for citizens

Youth

1. Youth will demonstrate the necessary leadership, teamwork, and communication skills needed to be successful in the workplace. 
2. Youth participation in community involvement increases.  
3. Youth will serve in leadership roles in their community.  
4. Youth will more effectively communicate, work with others, and contribute to driving change and shaping the future. 

Work/Life Skills

Adult

1. Increased human capital among Kentuckians
2. Decrease in state unemployment rates
3. Improved quality of workforce

Youth

1. Youth will demonstrate the necessary leadership, teamwork, and communication skills needed to be successful in the workplace. 
2. Youth participation in community involvement increases.
3. Youth will serve in leadership roles in their community.
4. Youth will more effectively communicate, work with others, and contribute to driving change and shaping the future. 
5. Youth will become engaged, healthy, and productive members of their communities.

Intermediate Outcomes:

Leadership

Adult

1. Participants gain confidence to lead
2. Leaders are inspired to get more involved
3. Leaders address community issues and needs
4. Leaders recruit and engage others to participate in community projects
5. Leaders mentor others
6. Increased knowledge transfer through volunteer-led positions

Youth 

1. Youth will practice teamwork, responsibility, communication, conflict resolution techniques, and problem-solving skills.  
2. Youth will plan and implement a service project. 

Work/Life Skills

Adult

1. Increased implementation of employability strategies/skills
2. Increased salary/income
3. Increased employment 

Youth

1. Youth will practice teamwork, responsibility, communication, conflict resolution techniques, and problem-solving skills.
2. Youth will plan and implement a service project.
3. Youth will choose to take on leadership roles in their community.

Initial Outcomes:

Leadership

Adult

1. Improved leadership skills
2. Enhanced knowledge of concepts and practices
3. Knowledge gained through training programs
4. Taking on leadership roles for the first time
5. Assuming new leadership roles
6. Participants give their time to serve in a volunteer role.

Youth

1. Youth will explore their spark in leadership. 
2. Youth identify personal strengths that contribute to leadership skill development (communication, teamwork, civic engagement).  
3. Youth successfully worked in a team environment to accomplish a task.  
4. Youth realize how their actions impact others

Work/Life Skills

Adult

Strengthening work and life skills, including but not limited to, developing workforce development skills, employability and interpersonal skills, and work-life management strategies.

1. Developed skills related to workforce development
2. Improved employability and interpersonal skills
3. Increased confidence to implement employability strategies
4. Developed strategies for maintaining a healthy work-life balance

Youth

1. Youth identify personal strengths that contribute to life and work skill development.
2. Increased knowledge of career pathways.
3. Increased knowledge of educational, training, and certification opportunities.
4. Youth will practice civic engagement, leadership and communication skills.

Evaluation:

Leadership

Adult

Outcome: Improved leadership skills. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people reporting improved leadership skills (e.g., facilitation, conflict management, communication).

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains)

Timeline: The Survey will be collected immediately after program participation

 

Outcome: Knowledge gained through completing training programs. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people reporting enhanced knowledge of leadership concepts and practices (e.g. leadership styles, conflict resolution, team dynamics).

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains)

Timeline: The Survey will be collected immediately after program participation

Outcome: Increased applied leadership knowledge for individuals serving in formal leadership roles. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people reporting improved applied leadership knowledge (e.g., governance, financial oversight, strategic planning) from participation in board, officer, or leadership training programs.

Method: Post-training surveys measuring knowledge gained in governance-related skills

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after training; follow-up conducted at three and six months to assess knowledge application 

 

Outcome: Increased participation in leadership roles by first-time leaders. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people taking on a leadership role for the first time as a result of Extension leadership programs.

Method: Post-participation survey (self-reported leadership involvement); follow-up evaluation with community partners.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion and follow up evaluation conducted at six months.

 

Outcome: Expanded leadership engagement among program participants. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people assuming new leadership roles (formal or informal) as a result of Extension leadership programs.

Method: Post-participation survey (self-reported leadership role adoption); annual follow-up tracking leadership retention.

Timeline: Initial survey collected at program completion; follow-up evaluation annually

 

Outcome: Giving time to serve in volunteer roles (e.g., KEHA or KALP members, Master programs, etc.). (initial)

Indicator: Number of people volunteering time to assist Extension or community activities and events (ex: KEHA or KALP members, Master programs, etc.)

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains)

Timeline: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation; also monthly, quarterly, or annual volunteer hour reports.

 

Outcome: Increased engagement via knowledge transfer through volunteer-led Extension programs. (initial)

Indicator: Number of participants who actively engaged in learning opportunities facilitated by trained Extension volunteers (e.g., KEHA or KALP members, Master programs).

Method: Post-event/program surveys measuring participant engagement and knowledge gained; volunteer reports tracking education interactions.

Timeline: Data collected immediately after each program/event.

 

Outcome: Increased confidence to lead. (intermediate)

Indicator: Number of people reporting increased confidence in their leadership abilities. 

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains); monitoring changes in local and state leadership positions.

Timeline: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation or via follow-up evaluation after six months.

 

Outcome: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation or via follow-up evaluation after six months.

Indicator: Number of volunteers addressing community issues by assessing needs, developing programs and/or implementing solutions.

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported participation in community issue resolution); documentation of volunteer-led initiatives.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program participation; follow-up evaluation conducted at 3 and 6 months.

 

Outcome: Leaders recruit and engage others to participate in projects. (intermediate)

Indicator: Number of people actively recruiting and engaging others to participate in community projects.

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported recruitment efforts); tracking participation in community-led projects.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conducted at three and six months.

 

Outcome: Increased mentorship opportunities within leadership programs. (intermediate)

Indicator: Number of people serving as mentors to emerging leaders..

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported mentorship engagement); follow-up with mentees and community partners.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conducted at six months.

 

Outcome: Engage leaders in local coalitions and organizations. (long-term)

Indicator: Number of individuals actively engaged in coalitions or organizations to address significant community issues.

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported recruitment efforts); tracking participation in coalitions and organizations.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conducted at three and six months.

 

Outcome: Implementation of strategies that improve community conditions. (long-term)

Indicator: Number of strategies reported as adopted and implemented to improve community conditions.

Method: Program reports, community partner documentation, and case studies tracking the implementation of strategies.

Timeline: Data collected through quarterly or annual reporting from program participants and community stakeholders.

 

Outcome: Increased community pride (long-term)

Indicator: Number of participants reporting a stronger sense of pride, identity, or community investment after engaging in Extension initiatives.

Method: Photos, documentation, post-program survey; follow up.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conduced at 3 and 6 months.

Survey Youth

Outcome: Short Term  

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they have identified personal strengths in leadership (including teamwork, responsibilities, communication, conflict resolution, problem solving, parliamentary procedure).  
• Number of youth who reported that they have set goals to serve in leadership roles.  
• Number of youth who reported that they are interested in serving as a leader. 

Method: Survey  

Timeline: After Program/ Activity Completion  

 

Outcome: Medium Term

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they applied leadership skills learned in 4-H (e.g., teamwork, responsibilities, communication, conflict resolution, problem solving, parliamentary procedure) to other areas of their life, such as at home, school, etc.  
• Number of youth who reported that they have served in leadership roles beyond the 4-H club or county level. 
• Number of youth who reported that they have used the skills learned in to plan and implement a workshop or activity.  

Method: Survey 

Timeline: At the end of the Club/Program Year  

Outcome: Long Term

Indicator: Long-term evaluation will be conducted using the National 4-H Index Study

Method: Survey  

Timeline: At least a year from participation

Work/Life Skills

Adult

Outcome: Improved leadership skills. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people reporting improved leadership skills (e.g., facilitation, conflict management, communication).

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains)

Timeline: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation

Outcome: Knowledge gained through completing training programs. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people reporting enhanced knowledge of leadership concepts and practices (e.g. leadership styles, conflict resolution, team dynamics).

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains)

Timeline: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation

Outcome: Increased applied leadership knowledge for individuals serving in formal leadership roles. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people reporting improved applied leadership knowledge (e.g., governance, financial oversight, strategic planning) from participation in board, officer, or leadership training programs.

Method: Post-training surveys measuring knowledge gained in governance-related skills

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after training; follow-up conducted at three and six months to assess knowledge application 

Outcome: Increased participation in leadership roles by first-time leaders. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people taking on a leadership role for the first time as a result of Extension leadership programs.

Method: Post-participation survey (self-reported leadership involvement); follow-up evaluation with community partners.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion and follow up evaluation conducted at six months.

 

Outcome: Expanded leadership engagement among program participants. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people assuming new leadership roles (formal or informal) as a result of Extension leadership programs.

Method: Post-participation survey (self-reported leadership role adoption); annual follow-up tracking leadership retention.

Timeline: Initial survey collected at program completion; follow-up evaluation annually

Outcome: Giving time to serve in volunteer roles (e.g., KEHA or KALP members, Master programs, etc.). (initial)

Indicator: Number of people volunteering time to assist Extension or community activities and events (ex: KEHA or KALP members, Master programs, etc.)

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains)

Timeline: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation; also monthly, quarterly, or annual volunteer hour reports.

 

Outcome: Increased engagement via knowledge transfer through volunteer-led Extension programs. (initial)

Indicator: Number of participants who actively engaged in learning opportunities facilitated by trained Extension volunteers (e.g., KEHA or KALP members, Master programs).

Method: Post-event/program surveys measuring participant engagement and knowledge gained; volunteer reports tracking education interactions.

Timeline: Data collected immediately after each program/event.

Outcome: Increased confidence to lead. (intermediate)

Indicator: Number of people reporting increased confidence in their leadership abilities. 

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains); monitoring changes in local and state leadership positions.

Timeline: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation or via follow-up evaluation after six months.

 

Outcome: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation or via follow-up evaluation after six months.

Indicator: Number of volunteers addressing community issues by assessing needs, developing programs and/or implementing solutions.

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported participation in community issue resolution); documentation of volunteer-led initiatives.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program participation; follow-up evaluation conducted at 3 and 6 months.

 

Outcome: Leaders recruit and engage others to participate in projects. (intermediate)

Indicator: Number of people actively recruiting and engaging others to participate in community projects.

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported recruitment efforts); tracking participation in community-led projects.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conducted at three and six months.

 

Outcome: Increased mentorship opportunities within leadership programs. (intermediate)

Indicator: Number of people serving as mentors to emerging leaders..

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported mentorship engagement); follow-up with mentees and community partners.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conducted at six months.

 

Outcome: Engage leaders in local coalitions and organizations. (long-term)

Indicator: Number of individuals actively engaged in coalitions or organizations to address significant community issues.

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported recruitment efforts); tracking participation in coalitions and organizations.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conducted at three and six months.

 

Outcome: Implementation of strategies that improve community conditions. (long-term)

Indicator: Number of strategies reported as adopted and implemented to improve community conditions.

Method: Program reports, community partner documentation, and case studies tracking the implementation of strategies.

Timeline: Data collected through quarterly or annual reporting from program participants and community stakeholders.

 

Outcome: Increased community pride (long-term)

Indicator: Number of participants reporting a stronger sense of pride, identity, or community investment after engaging in Extension initiatives.

Method: Photos, documentation, post-program survey; follow-up.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conducted at 3 and 6 months.

Survey Youth

Outcome: Short Term  

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they have identified personal strengths in leadership (including teamwork, responsibilities, communication, conflict resolution, problem solving, parliamentary procedure).  
• Number of youth who reported that they have set goals to serve in leadership roles.  
• Number of youth who reported that they are interested in serving as a leader. 

Method: Survey  

Timeline: After Program/ Activity Completion  

 

Outcome: Medium Term

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they applied leadership skills learned in 4-H (e.g., teamwork, responsibilities, communication, conflict resolution, problem solving, parliamentary procedure) to other areas of their life, such as at home, school, etc.  
• Number of youth who reported that they have served in leadership roles beyond the 4-H club or county level. 
• Number of youth who reported that they have used the skills learned in to plan and implement a workshop or activity.  

Method: Survey 

Timeline: At the end of the Club/Program Year  

 

Outcome: Long Term

Indicator: Long-term evaluation will be conducted using the National 4-H Index Study

Method: Survey  

Outcome: Master Gardeners Volunteerism (short term)

Indicator: 

• Number of Master Gardener volunteers who completed training
• Number of Master Gardener volunteer service hours
• Number of clients engaged by Master Gardeners
• Number of programs led by Master Gardeners

Method: Volunteer records and meeting rosters

Timeline: Annually

Learning Opportunities:

Leadership

Adult

Audience: Individuals

Project or Activity: Kentucky Extension Homemakers Association (KEHA)

Content or Curriculum: KEHA Leadership Academy, Homemakers Leader Lessons, Publications, Newsletters/News & Notes, Officer/Chairman training materials, KEHA State Meeting, various other resources and materials

Inputs: Programmatic materials, training, mentoring, paid staff, volunteers, community partners, non-profits, etc.

Dates: Ongoing

 

Audience: Individuals

Project or Activity: Master Clothing Volunteers (MCV)

Content or Curriculum: Publications, MCV training, continuing education/content experts

Inputs: Programmatic materials, paid staff, volunteers, community partners, agents, Homemakers, etc.

Dates: Ongoing

 

Audience: Individuals

Project or Activity: Kentucky Extension Leadership Development (KELD)

Content or Curriculum: KELD curriculum (e.g., Learning styles, communication essentials, teamwork, dealing with conflict, generational differences, SWOT analysis, etc.), Publications, other materials and expertise

Inputs: Programmatic materials, paid staff, community partners, volunteers, etc.

Dates: Ongoing

 

Audience: Individuals

Project or Activity: Kentucky Agricultural Leadership Program (KALP)

Content or Curriculum: KALP curriculum, Publications, other materials and expertise

Inputs: Programmatic materials, paid staff, external evaluators, community partners, volunteers, etc. 

Dates: Ongoing

 

Audience: Communities

Project or Activity: Supporting Citizen Engagement

Content or Curriculum: Creating Welcoming Communities, Becoming an Informed Citizen, Robert’s Rules Refresh, Youth & Adult Listening Sessions, KY Voter Education Resources, Engaging City Councils, Civic Engagement Through Voting, How To: Community Forums

Inputs: Programmatic materials, paid staff, community partners, volunteers, grant funds, local organizations and community partners, etc. 

Dates: Ongoing

Youth

Audience: Youth  

Project or Activity: 4-H Leadership Program

Content or Curriculum: Curriculum such as Leadership Skills you never outgrow is sourced from Shop 4-H and Ricochet: An Extreme 4-H Leadership Adventure is sourced from other Land Grant Systems. All curriculum pieces focus on leadership, communication, and civic engagement.

Inputs: In school clubs for middle and high school, after school clubs for teens, area ten councils, Middle school leadership clubs, and civic engagement opportunities. These programs are supported by the research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system, funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc., local, state, and federal sources, grants, and the engagement of volunteers, youth, communities, and external stakeholders such as civic groups. 

Dates: All Year Long

 

Audience: Youth  

Project or Activity: Teen Conference

Content or Curriculum: Curriculum is sourced from Shop 4-H and the Land Grant System, focuses on leadership, communication, and civic engagement.

Inputs: These programs are supported by the research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system, funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc., local, state, and federal sources, grants, and the engagement of volunteers, youth, communities, and external stakeholders such as civic groups.

Dates: Summer  

 

Audience: Youth  

Project or Activity: 4-H Summit

Content or Curriculum: Curriculum is sourced from Shop 4-H and the Land Grant System, focuses on leadership, communication, and civic engagement.

Inputs: These programs are supported by the research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system, funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc., local, state, and federal sources, grants, and the engagement of volunteers, youth, communities, and external stakeholders such as civic groups.

Dates: Fall 

 

Audience: Youth 

Project or Activity: 4-H State Teen Council, Leadership Boards and Task Forces 

Content or Curriculum: Curriculum is sourced from Shop 4-H and the Land Grant System, focuses on leadership, communication, and civic engagement.

Inputs: These programs are supported by the research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system, funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc., local, state, and federal sources, grants, and the engagement of volunteers, youth, communities, and external stakeholders such as civic groups. 

Dates: Throughout the Program year

 

Audience: Youth  

Project or Activity: 4-H Camp Counselor Training (Teens) 

Content or Curriculum: Content in the Camp Volunteer Training Guide is sourced from the American Camp Association's best practices and focuses on developmental needs of campers, safety considerations, operating procedures, age-appropriate behavior management, and camper supervision techniques.

Inputs: These trainings are supported by the research base of the American Camp Association with materials provided by the 4-H State Office, funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc., local, state, and federal sources, grants, and led by County Extension Staff responsible for 4-H Camp. 

Dates: Pre-Summer   

 

Audience: Youth  

Project or Activity: Achievement Program

Content or Curriculum: Curriculum is sourced from Shop 4-H and the Land Grant System, focuses on leadership, communication, and civic engagement. 

Inputs: These programs are supported by the research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system, funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc., local, state, and federal sources, grants, and the engagement of volunteers, youth, communities, and external stakeholders such as civic groups. 

Dates: Throughout the year

Work/Life Skills

Adult

Audience: Individuals, Families, Employees

Project or Activity: Development of Time Management Skills

Content or Curriculum: Time Well Spent: Productivity Skills for Success curriculum; publications, newsletters; Leader Lessons; podcasts; etc.

Inputs: Programmatic materials, paid staff, volunteers, community partners, non-profit organizations, schools, Chamber of Commerce, businesses, etc.

Date: Ongoing

 

Audience: Individuals, Families, Employees

Project or Activity: Development of Employability Skills

Content or Curriculum: Positive Employability; Preparing for Financial Success curriculum; publications, newsletters (e.g., MONEYWI$E); Job Club; podcasts; PROFIT; Recovering Your Finances curriculum; OneOp; Enhancing Essential Skills Through the Arts curriculum and lessons, Artist Studio Guide lessons, publications

Inputs: Programmatic materials, paid staff, volunteers, community partners, non-profit organizations, schools, Court system, community centers, etc.

Date: Ongoing

Audience: Farmers

Project or Activity: Adair County Cattlemen's

Content or Curriculum: Association meetings, board meetings, CAIP, field days

Inputs: Programmatic materials, training, mentoring, volunteers, community partners, non-profits, etc.

Dates: Ongoing

Audience: Farmers

Project or Activity: Adair County Ag Development Council

Content or Curriculum: Board meetings, special projects

Inputs: Programmatic materials, training, mentoring, volunteers, community partners, non-profits, etc.

Dates: Ongoing

Audience: Master Gardeners

Project or Activity: Volunteer hours and leadership

Content or Curriculum: EMG

Inputs: Programmatic materials, training, mentoring, volunteers, community partners, non-profits, etc.

Dates: Ongoing

Youth

Audience: 4-Hers, Extension Professionals, Clientele 

Project or Activity: 4-H Core Program Areas (Leadership, Agriculture, Natural Resources, Communication and Expressive Arts, Science, Engineering and Technology, Health and Wellbeing, and Family Consumer Sciences), 4-H Camp, Cloverbud, Volunteerism

Content or Curriculum: Approved Kentucky 4-H Curriculum by Core Program Area or Area of Interest

Inputs: These programs are supported by the research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system, funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc., local, state, and federal sources, grants, and the engagement of volunteers, youth, communities, and external stakeholders.

Dates: Program Year 

 

Audience: 4-Hers, Extension Professionals, Clientele

Project or Activity: 4-H Resume, Cover Letter, and Interview Skills Program (Club/Group/Individual)

Content or Curriculum: Kentucky 4-H Work & Life Readiness Lessons, 4-H Build Your Future, Work Ready Life Skills, and Leap into Careers.

Inputs: These programs are supported by the research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system, funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc., local, state, and federal sources, grants, and the engagement of volunteers, youth, communities, and external stakeholders such as civic groups. Focus is on Grades 8-12.

Dates: Program Year

 

Audience: 4-Hers, Extension Professionals, Clientele 

Project or Activity: 4-H Life and Work Readiness (Club/Group/Individual) 

Content or Curriculum: Kentucky 4-H Work & Life Readiness Lessons, 4-H Build Your Future, Work Ready Life Skills, and Leap into Careers

Inputs: These programs are supported by the research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system, funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc., local, state, and federal sources, grants, and the engagement of volunteers, youth, communities, and external stakeholders such as civic groups. Focus is on Grades 4-12.

Dates: Program Year 

Evaluation:

Leadership

Adult

Outcome: Improved leadership skills. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people reporting improved leadership skills (e.g., facilitation, conflict management, communication).

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains)

Timeline: The Survey will be collected immediately after program participation

 

Outcome: Knowledge gained through completing training programs. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people reporting enhanced knowledge of leadership concepts and practices (e.g. leadership styles, conflict resolution, team dynamics).

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains)

Timeline: The Survey will be collected immediately after program participation

Outcome: Increased applied leadership knowledge for individuals serving in formal leadership roles. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people reporting improved applied leadership knowledge (e.g., governance, financial oversight, strategic planning) from participation in board, officer, or leadership training programs.

Method: Post-training surveys measuring knowledge gained in governance-related skills

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after training; follow-up conducted at three and six months to assess knowledge application 

 

Outcome: Increased participation in leadership roles by first-time leaders. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people taking on a leadership role for the first time as a result of Extension leadership programs.

Method: Post-participation survey (self-reported leadership involvement); follow-up evaluation with community partners.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion and follow up evaluation conducted at six months.

 

Outcome: Expanded leadership engagement among program participants. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people assuming new leadership roles (formal or informal) as a result of Extension leadership programs.

Method: Post-participation survey (self-reported leadership role adoption); annual follow-up tracking leadership retention.

Timeline: Initial survey collected at program completion; follow-up evaluation annually

 

Outcome: Giving time to serve in volunteer roles (e.g., KEHA or KALP members, Master programs, etc.). (initial)

Indicator: Number of people volunteering time to assist Extension or community activities and events (ex: KEHA or KALP members, Master programs, etc.)

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains)

Timeline: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation; also monthly, quarterly, or annual volunteer hour reports.

 

Outcome: Increased engagement via knowledge transfer through volunteer-led Extension programs. (initial)

Indicator: Number of participants who actively engaged in learning opportunities facilitated by trained Extension volunteers (e.g., KEHA or KALP members, Master programs).

Method: Post-event/program surveys measuring participant engagement and knowledge gained; volunteer reports tracking education interactions.

Timeline: Data collected immediately after each program/event.

 

Outcome: Increased confidence to lead. (intermediate)

Indicator: Number of people reporting increased confidence in their leadership abilities. 

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains); monitoring changes in local and state leadership positions.

Timeline: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation or via follow-up evaluation after six months.

 

Outcome: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation or via follow-up evaluation after six months.

Indicator: Number of volunteers addressing community issues by assessing needs, developing programs and/or implementing solutions.

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported participation in community issue resolution); documentation of volunteer-led initiatives.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program participation; follow-up evaluation conducted at 3 and 6 months.

 

Outcome: Leaders recruit and engage others to participate in projects. (intermediate)

Indicator: Number of people actively recruiting and engaging others to participate in community projects.

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported recruitment efforts); tracking participation in community-led projects.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conducted at three and six months.

 

Outcome: Increased mentorship opportunities within leadership programs. (intermediate)

Indicator: Number of people serving as mentors to emerging leaders..

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported mentorship engagement); follow-up with mentees and community partners.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conducted at six months.

 

Outcome: Engage leaders in local coalitions and organizations. (long-term)

Indicator: Number of individuals actively engaged in coalitions or organizations to address significant community issues.

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported recruitment efforts); tracking participation in coalitions and organizations.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conducted at three and six months.

 

Outcome: Implementation of strategies that improve community conditions. (long-term)

Indicator: Number of strategies reported as adopted and implemented to improve community conditions.

Method: Program reports, community partner documentation, and case studies tracking the implementation of strategies.

Timeline: Data collected through quarterly or annual reporting from program participants and community stakeholders.

 

Outcome: Increased community pride (long-term)

Indicator: Number of participants reporting a stronger sense of pride, identity, or community investment after engaging in Extension initiatives.

Method: Photos, documentation, post-program survey; follow up.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conduced at 3 and 6 months.

Survey Youth

Outcome: Short Term  

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they have identified personal strengths in leadership (including teamwork, responsibilities, communication, conflict resolution, problem solving, parliamentary procedure).  
• Number of youth who reported that they have set goals to serve in leadership roles.  
• Number of youth who reported that they are interested in serving as a leader. 

Method: Survey  

Timeline: After Program/ Activity Completion  

 

Outcome: Medium Term

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they applied leadership skills learned in 4-H (e.g., teamwork, responsibilities, communication, conflict resolution, problem solving, parliamentary procedure) to other areas of their life, such as at home, school, etc.  
• Number of youth who reported that they have served in leadership roles beyond the 4-H club or county level. 
• Number of youth who reported that they have used the skills learned in to plan and implement a workshop or activity.  

Method: Survey 

Timeline: At the end of the Club/Program Year  

Outcome: Long Term

Indicator: Long-term evaluation will be conducted using the National 4-H Index Study

Method: Survey  

Timeline: At least a year from participation

Work/Life Skills

Adult

Outcome: Improved leadership skills. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people reporting improved leadership skills (e.g., facilitation, conflict management, communication).

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains)

Timeline: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation

Outcome: Knowledge gained through completing training programs. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people reporting enhanced knowledge of leadership concepts and practices (e.g. leadership styles, conflict resolution, team dynamics).

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains)

Timeline: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation

Outcome: Increased applied leadership knowledge for individuals serving in formal leadership roles. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people reporting improved applied leadership knowledge (e.g., governance, financial oversight, strategic planning) from participation in board, officer, or leadership training programs.

Method: Post-training surveys measuring knowledge gained in governance-related skills

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after training; follow-up conducted at three and six months to assess knowledge application 

Outcome: Increased participation in leadership roles by first-time leaders. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people taking on a leadership role for the first time as a result of Extension leadership programs.

Method: Post-participation survey (self-reported leadership involvement); follow-up evaluation with community partners.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion and follow up evaluation conducted at six months.

 

Outcome: Expanded leadership engagement among program participants. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people assuming new leadership roles (formal or informal) as a result of Extension leadership programs.

Method: Post-participation survey (self-reported leadership role adoption); annual follow-up tracking leadership retention.

Timeline: Initial survey collected at program completion; follow-up evaluation annually

Outcome: Giving time to serve in volunteer roles (e.g., KEHA or KALP members, Master programs, etc.). (initial)

Indicator: Number of people volunteering time to assist Extension or community activities and events (ex: KEHA or KALP members, Master programs, etc.)

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains)

Timeline: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation; also monthly, quarterly, or annual volunteer hour reports.

 

Outcome: Increased engagement via knowledge transfer through volunteer-led Extension programs. (initial)

Indicator: Number of participants who actively engaged in learning opportunities facilitated by trained Extension volunteers (e.g., KEHA or KALP members, Master programs).

Method: Post-event/program surveys measuring participant engagement and knowledge gained; volunteer reports tracking education interactions.

Timeline: Data collected immediately after each program/event.

Outcome: Increased confidence to lead. (intermediate)

Indicator: Number of people reporting increased confidence in their leadership abilities. 

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains); monitoring changes in local and state leadership positions.

Timeline: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation or via follow-up evaluation after six months.

 

Outcome: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation or via follow-up evaluation after six months.

Indicator: Number of volunteers addressing community issues by assessing needs, developing programs and/or implementing solutions.

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported participation in community issue resolution); documentation of volunteer-led initiatives.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program participation; follow-up evaluation conducted at 3 and 6 months.

 

Outcome: Leaders recruit and engage others to participate in projects. (intermediate)

Indicator: Number of people actively recruiting and engaging others to participate in community projects.

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported recruitment efforts); tracking participation in community-led projects.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conducted at three and six months.

 

Outcome: Increased mentorship opportunities within leadership programs. (intermediate)

Indicator: Number of people serving as mentors to emerging leaders..

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported mentorship engagement); follow-up with mentees and community partners.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conducted at six months.

 

Outcome: Engage leaders in local coalitions and organizations. (long-term)

Indicator: Number of individuals actively engaged in coalitions or organizations to address significant community issues.

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported recruitment efforts); tracking participation in coalitions and organizations.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conducted at three and six months.

 

Outcome: Implementation of strategies that improve community conditions. (long-term)

Indicator: Number of strategies reported as adopted and implemented to improve community conditions.

Method: Program reports, community partner documentation, and case studies tracking the implementation of strategies.

Timeline: Data collected through quarterly or annual reporting from program participants and community stakeholders.

 

Outcome: Increased community pride (long-term)

Indicator: Number of participants reporting a stronger sense of pride, identity, or community investment after engaging in Extension initiatives.

Method: Photos, documentation, post-program survey; follow-up.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conducted at 3 and 6 months.

Survey Youth

Outcome: Short Term  

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they have identified personal strengths in leadership (including teamwork, responsibilities, communication, conflict resolution, problem solving, parliamentary procedure).  
• Number of youth who reported that they have set goals to serve in leadership roles.  
• Number of youth who reported that they are interested in serving as a leader. 

Method: Survey  

Timeline: After Program/ Activity Completion  

 

Outcome: Medium Term

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they applied leadership skills learned in 4-H (e.g., teamwork, responsibilities, communication, conflict resolution, problem solving, parliamentary procedure) to other areas of their life, such as at home, school, etc.  
• Number of youth who reported that they have served in leadership roles beyond the 4-H club or county level. 
• Number of youth who reported that they have used the skills learned in to plan and implement a workshop or activity.  

Method: Survey 

Timeline: At the end of the Club/Program Year  

 

Outcome: Long Term

Indicator: Long-term evaluation will be conducted using the National 4-H Index Study

Method: Survey  

Outcome: Master Gardeners Volunteerism (short term)

Indicator: 

• Number of Master Gardener volunteers who completed training
• Number of Master Gardener volunteer service hours
• Number of clients engaged by Master Gardeners
• Number of programs led by Master Gardeners

Method: Volunteer records and meeting rosters

Timeline: Annually