Pendleton County CES

County Emphasis:

Fostering Community & Leadership Development

Concentration 1:

Small Farm Development

Concentration 2:

Connected & Resilient Communities

Concentration 3:

Building Leadership Capacity

Situation:

Small Farm Development   Small farm development is a crucial aspect of the Kentucky agricultural sector, especially in the context of supporting rural economies and ensuring food security. The National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) defines a small farm as an operation with a gross cash farm income of $250,000 or less. These farms are typically family-owned and operated, and they represent more than 90 percent of farms in the U.S. These farms face challenges such as urbanization, an aging farmer population, farm consolidation, new and beginning farmers, and changing climate patterns. Small farms play a vital role in the competitiveness and sustainability of rural and farm economies, protecting and enhancing natural resources and the environment, and maintaining rural populations. Urban small scale farm production is an emerging and fast grow segment of farm economies. The development and sustainability of small farms is important in providing a nursery for new enterprises and marketing systems, which is crucial for innovation and diversification in agriculture. Small farm development can be hindered by access to capital, markets, and technology. Additionally, owners of small farms may lack the knowledge or resources to implement sustainable practices that could improve their economic viability and environmental stewardship. Kentucky Cooperative Extension will continue to aid small farm owners by providing educational opportunities and increasing awareness of resources offered through various programs and online platforms. This includes developing new and improved practices to reduce production costs, protect and improve soil and water resources, and offer options for specialty crop production. Extension personnel will also promote whole farm plans, estate planning, farm transitions, risk management, and market opportunities. The development of small farms is imperative for the health of Kentucky’s agricultural sector, rural communities and emerge urban agriculture.   Connected & Resilient Communities    Kentucky’s communities face unique challenges that require enhancing connectivity and resilience through digital access, social cohesion, and well-designed public spaces. Broadband access remains critical, particularly in rural areas where digital connectivity gaps hinder economic and educational opportunities. The 2023 Community Needs Assessment identified improved broadband and digital literacy as top priorities for enhancing community resilience. Extension’s connectivity and resilience efforts focus on supporting local economies and helping communities recover from economic shifts and natural disasters (CEDIK, 2024). By promoting digital literacy, educating on safe and vibrant outdoor spaces, and implementing place-based disaster preparedness programs, Extension strengthens community connections and economic sustainability. These initiatives benefit residents, businesses, and local governments, fostering stronger, more resilient communities equipped to face future challenges.   Youth Focus In today’s rapidly evolving world, youth are and can play a pivotal role in shaping the future of connected and resilient communities. Young people are leveraging technology and social networks to foster strong, supportive relationships that transcend geographical boundaries. They are actively engaged in community-building activities, promoting access to opportunity, and driving change. By participating in local and global initiatives, they are not only enhancing their own resilience but also contributing to the overall strength and adaptability of their communities. Their innovative approaches to problem-solving and their commitment to sustainability are essential in addressing the complex challenges of the 21st century. As they continue to collaborate and share knowledge, youth are laying the foundation for a more connected and resilient world. 4-H is committed to providing the resources necessary to promote youth connection in their communities. Thriving youth are healthy, productive, and engaged (Arnold, 2024). Communities that promote the indicators of youth thriving will have more connected, capable, and committed citizens that can critically think through addressing the needs and priorities of their community.   Building Leadership Capacity   Leadership is critical at several levels, from elected officials and internal management structure of organizations to project managers, team leaders, and those who inspire throughout a community. Thriving communities may require many leaders willing to take on leadership roles. And yet, it can be a challenge to identify new leaders or to encourage leaders to step up to the role without first building leadership capacity (CEDIK 2024). Respondents participating in the University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Community Needs Assessment identified the need to build leadership capacity to enhance individual and family development and community and economic development. Kentucky has a statewide need to “prepare community members for formal/informal leadership and/or volunteer roles” and to build “capacity of local nonprofits and community leaders,” according to the survey. UK Extension aims to work on strengthening critical leadership skills and confidence for new and emerging leaders so that the pool of willing and capable leaders can rise to match local needs. Volunteer training can have motivational benefits ranging from inspiring volunteers to get more involved to keeping them in the program (Fox, Hebert, Martin & Bairnsfather, 2009).   Youth Focus  4-H opportunities profoundly impact individuals and communities in Kentucky by equipping youth with essential skills like communication, teamwork, and problem-solving, fostering personal leadership, and community engagement. Skills like analytical thinking, creative thinking, resilience, flexibility, and adaptability are key to future employment (World Economic Forum, 2023). 77% of employers say that there should be less focus on traditional school subjects and more focus on real-world skills (Kauffman Foundation, 2021). In the 2023 University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service Needs Assessment youth life skill training opportunities (such as leadership and communication skill opportunities), strengthening youth workforce readiness, and strengthening youth-adult or mentorship relationships were top priorities across Kentucky. According to the National 4-H Annual Index Survey (2024), 95% of youth identified their strengths through 4-H, 80% explored career options, and 50% received guidance for college decisions. Additionally, 75% enjoyed helping their community, and 93% felt inspired by 4-H, with 42% being inspired “a lot” to volunteer. These experiences build leadership capacity, promote civic engagement, and create connected, resilient communities by encouraging critical thinking and empathy. Furthermore, 4-H offers life skill training, strengthens youth workforce readiness, fosters mentorship, maximizes youth voice in important issues, and enhances peer-peer relationships.

County Situation:

Pendleton County has strong potential for economic and community growth through the development of entrepreneurship and leadership skills. The 2023 Community Needs Assessment identified enhancing leadership capacity, fostering innovation, and supporting small farm and local business development as critical priorities. Rural challenges, such as limited access to resources and markets, present opportunities for increasing agricultural diversity, building local resilience, and expanding workforce preparedness. The aging leadership population creates a need for developing younger leaders, while the agricultural sector requires more innovation and diversification. Extension is uniquely positioned to address these challenges by leveraging its expertise in family and youth development, leadership training, skill-building, and financial literacy. By focusing on these areas, including expanding broadband access and improving small business resilience, Extension can drive meaningful, long-term improvements in Pendleton County’s economic vitality and social well-being.  Data:  1. Small Farm Development:  75% of Pendleton County farms are small (<180 acres), with 60% focused on hay and pasture.  Only 10% of farms grow specialty crops, despite demand for local products.  50% of farms raise livestock, but fewer than 30% use sustainable grazing practices.  Only 20% of small farms apply for grants or cost-share programs due to lack of knowledge.  2. Building Leadership Capacity:  Many current leaders are over 65, with a need to develop younger leaders.  Specialized leadership training for farmers and small business owners to strengthen economic and agricultural leadership.  3. Connected and Resilient Communities:  65% of residents have access to high-speed internet, limiting growth opportunities.  Need to improve broadband access and digital literacy for local businesses and education.  Only 25% of residents engage in volunteer activities, requiring stronger community engagement.  Leadership certification and volunteer programs will enhance governance and social connections.  Small business survival rate is low; support and training are needed for economic resilience.  Focus on improving disaster preparedness and community infrastructure for long-term resilience.   Sources:   National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). "Pendleton County Profile." United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2017. Retrieved from https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2017/Online_Resources/County_Profiles/Kentucky/cp21191.pdf.  CEDIK, University of Kentucky. "Pendleton County Data Profile." Center for Economic Development, Innovation, and Knowledge (CEDIK). Retrieved from https://cedik.ca.uky.edu/CountyDataProfiles.  Kentucky Center for Statistics (KYSTATS). "Labor Force and Unemployment Data for Pendleton County." Kentucky Labor Market Information. Retrieved from https://kystats.ky.gov/KYLMI/LAUSUnemployment.  USDA Service Center Locator. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Retrieved from https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=fsa&state=us.  Farm Service Agency. "Kentucky State Committee." United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Retrieved from https://www.fsa.usda.gov/state-offices/kentucky.    By integrating these concentrations, Pendleton County Extension creates a synergy that encourages entrepreneurship, strengthens leadership, and builds a thriving, resilient community for current and future generations.

Long-Term Outcomes:

Small Farm Development   Achieve a stable economic environment where small farms are consistently profitable and competitive within both local and broader markets.  Establish networks of urban farms that are integral to their local food systems, providing fresh produce and fostering urban-rural agricultural links.  Strive to have all participating small farms fully implement sustainable practices that protect and enhance natural resources.  Equip small farms to adapt to and mitigate the impacts of changing climate patterns, ensuring their sustainability and resilience.  Enhance the role of small farms in maintaining rural populations and contributing to cultural heritage, ensuring that these communities remain vibrant and connected.    Connected & Resilient Communities   Adult Increased digital access improves economic and educational opportunities. Communities recover faster from disasters/economic disruptions Sustained investment in public spaces strengthens local economies Cultural heritage is preserved and integrated into communities Expanded partnerships enhance problem-solving and resource-sharing Improved quality of life through connection and civic engagement Youth Youth will demonstrate necessary leadership, teamwork, and communication skills needed to be successful in the workplace.?  Youth participation in community involvement increases.???  Youth will serve in leadership roles in their community.??  Youth will more effectively communicate, work with others, and contribute to driving change and shaping the future.??   Building Leadership Capacity    Adult Strong leadership pool for community boards and organizations Strong boards and organizations accomplish more in the community Increased community pride or investment Improved local economy Improved quality of life for citizens   Youth Youth will demonstrate necessary leadership, teamwork, and communication skills needed to be successful in the workplace.  Youth participation in community involvement increases.   Youth will serve in leadership roles in their community.   Youth will more effectively communicate, work with others, and contribute to driving change and shaping the future.

Intermediate Outcomes:

Small Farm Development   Assist small farm owners in developing and implementing comprehensive whole farm plans that address financial, production, and environmental aspects.  Support the establishment of new farm enterprises that can offer innovative products and practices, enhancing the economic resilience of the small farm sector.  Provide robust support for estate planning and farm transitions to ensure the longevity of small farms across generations.  Develop and disseminate advanced risk management tools and insurance products tailored for the unique needs of small farms.  Increase the accessibility of modern agricultural technologies to small farms, coupled with training programs that enable owners to effectively use these technologies. Connected & Resilient Communities   Adult More citizens adopt digital tools for work and daily life. Communities implement disaster preparedness and recovery strategies. More public spaces are revitalized for community engagement. Increased participation in cultural and arts-based programs. More individuals engage in local governance and civic groups. New partnerships and networks address community challenge Youth Youth will practice teamwork, responsibility, communication, conflict resolution techniques, and problem-solving skills.??  Youth will plan and implement a service project.?   Building Leadership Capacity   Adult Participants gain confidence to lead Leaders are inspired to get more involved Leaders address community issues and needs Leaders recruit and engage others to participate in community projects Leaders mentor others Increased knowledge transfer through volunteer-led positions   Youth Youth will practice teamwork, responsibility, communication, conflict resolution techniques, and problem-solving skills. Youth will plan and implement a service project.

Initial Outcomes:

Small Farm Development   Develop and launch targeted educational programs that focus on sustainable practices, risk management, and cost reduction specifically tailored for small farm owners.  Increase access to existing resources and tools including online platforms to increase awareness and usability for small farm owners.  Facilitate connections between small farm owners and local markets, including urban markets, to help diversify sales channels and improve income stability.  Implement trial programs for specialty crops that could be suitable for small farms, providing a new avenue for diversification and innovation in crop production.  Organize community events and workshops that foster networking among small farm owners and promote the sharing of best practices and innovations.    Connected & Resilient Communities   Adult Increased knowledge of digital tools and online resources. Improved understanding of disaster preparedness and recovery strategies. Greater awareness of the benefits of public spaces. Increased understanding of cultural development and community identity. Improved awareness of civic engagement opportunities. Greater knowledge of community partnerships and collaboration strategies Youth Youth identify personal strengths that contribute to leadership skill development (communication, teamwork, civic engagement).??  Youth successfully worked in a team environment to accomplish a task.??  Youth realize how their actions impact others.    Building Leadership Capacity     Adult Improved leadership skills Enhanced knowledge of concepts and practices Knowledge gained through training programs Taking on leadership roles for the first time Assuming new leadership roles Participants give their time to serve in volunteer roles Youth Youth will explore their spark in leadership.  Youth identify personal strengths that contribute to leadership skill development (communication, teamwork, civic engagement).   Youth successfully worked in a team environment to accomplish a task.   Youth realize how their actions impact others

Evaluation:

Small Farm Development  

Outcome: Improved commercial production practices for specialty crops 

Indicators: 

• Number of producers who reported increased yield.  
• Number of new or beginning specialty crop growers. 
• Number of producers who reported improved produce quality. 
• Number of trained volunteers.
• Number of commercial growers who reported improved produce quality.
• Number of commercial growers who reported increased yield in specialty crops (fruit, vegetables, herbs, etc.).
• Number of commercial growers who reported that they expanded or developed new markets for specialty crops. 
• Number of commercial specialty crop growers who reported adoption of new technologies (acquisition of greenhouse, high tunnel, lighting, etc.)
• Number of commercial specialty crop growers who reported improved management practices (soil sampling, foliar sampling, integrated pest management, cover cropping, etc.)
• Number of commercial specialty crop growers who reported reduced production inputs/costs.

Method: Grower survey, direct observation and feedback 

Timeline: ongoing 

Outcome: Increased application of recommended horticultural practices for non-commercial production 

Indicators: 

• Number of people that implemented environmental stewardship. 
• Number of people that reduced pesticide applications. 
• Number of community members utilizing the sites and/or amount of produce donated from sites. 
• Number of trained volunteers. 
• Number of self-reported volunteer hours at community sites. 
• Number of producers who reported reduced production inputs/costs. 

Method: Interactions with clients, attendance at Extension educational events, direct observation and feedback 

Timeline: ongoing 

Connected & Resilient Communities  

Adult

Outcome: Increased knowledge of digital tools and online resources (short term)

Indicator: Number of participants demonstrating increased confidence or skills in using digital tools (e.g., online banking, telehealth, online applications, or virtual platforms) after completing Extension training programs

Method: Post-participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains).

Timeline: Collected immediately after program participation.

Outcome: Improved understanding of disaster preparedness and recovery strategies (short term)

Indicator: Number of participants who reported that they intend to develop an emergency plan or preparedness kit after completing an Extension disaster training.

Method: Pre- and post-training survey.

Timeline: Collected before and after each session.

Outcome: Increased understanding of cultural development and community identity (short term)

Indicator: Number of participants who reported increased understanding of the value of building local cultural assets such as foodways, arts, and heritage traditions.

Method: Reflection surveys and community feedback.

Timeline: Collected within 30 days of participation.

Outcome: More individuals adopt digital tools for work and daily life (intermediate)

Indicator: Number of communities that reported implementing at least one new strategy to strengthen digital inclusion (e.g., improved public Wi-Fi, device access programs, digital literacy workshops) as a result of Extension-supported initiatives.

Method: Follow-up survey at 3 and 6 months.

Timeline: Collected at program completion and 6 months post-program.

Outcome: Communities implement disaster preparedness and recovery strategies (int)

Indicator: Number of businesses, farms, or households reporting faster post-disaster recovery due to preparedness actions learned through Extension.

Method: Post-disaster community case studies and resilience tracking.

Timeline: Assessed following disaster events.

Outcome: More public spaces are revitalized for community engagement (int)

Indicator: Number of individuals who reported that they contributed to efforts to improve public spaces through design, revitalization, or development (e.g., parks, community gathering areas, public art, creative placemaking projects) as a direct result of Extension-supported initiatives.

Method: Site visits, surveys, photo documentation, and community feedback.

Timeline: Tracked annually.

Outcome: More individuals engage in local governance and civic groups (int)

Indicator: Number of participants who reported increased involvement in local governance, community groups, or public forums as a result of program participation.

Method: Participant self-reporting and organizational membership tracking.

Timeline: Follow-up at 6 and 12 months.

Outcome: Expanded partnerships enhance problem-solving and resource-sharing

Indicator 1: Number of communities or organizations securing external funding (grants, sponsorships, or resource investments) as a result of Extension support.

Indicator 2: Number of new collaborative networks, partnerships, or cross-sector initiatives developed to address local challenges as a result of Extension-supported programs.

Method: grant tracking, partners surveys, local reports

Timeline: annually

Outcome: increased participation in cultural and arts-based programs

Indicator: Number of participants in Extension arts or design-based community programs (e.g., story circles, murals, design charettes, creative placemaking) who reported increased connection or belonging.

Method: pre- and post- surveys from program participation,

Timeline: after program participation

Outcome:  Improved quality of life through connection and civic engagement

Indicator:  Number of participants who reported experiencing stronger ties to their community as a result of participating in Extension arts programming with others.

Method: pre- and post- surveys from program participation

Timeline: after program participation

Outcome: Increased ability to access, interpret, and apply data for informed decision-making (initial).

Indicator: Number of participants reporting increased confidence in accessing, interpreting, and applying data to inform local decision-making.

Method: Self-reported surveys collected after data literacy training sessions, Agent documentation of community plans, grant applications, or policy discussions that reference data profiles.

Timeline: after program or training participation

Youth

Outcome: Short Term (Civic Education/Global Education)

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they identified community needs.  
• Number of youth who expressed interest in expanding their knowledge of other cultures.  
• Number of youth who reported that they can identify aspects of their own culture.  
• Number of youth who reported that they can name one responsibility they have as a citizen.  
• Number of youth who report increased confidence interacting with others as a result of their participation in Extension arts activities.

Method: Survey 

Timeline: Immediately post program

Outcome: Medium Term (Civic Education/Global Education) 

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they used the skills learned to plan and facilitate a service project. 
• Number of youth who reported that they can communicate to others an aspect of their own culture.  
• Number of youth who reported that they can explain one responsibility they have as a citizen.

Method: Survey 

Timeline: End of Program Year

Outcome: Long Term (Civic Education/Global Education)

Indicator: Long-term evaluation will be conducted using the National 4-H Index Study. 

Method: Survey 

Timeline: 1+ year

Outcome: Short Term (4-H Expressive Arts)

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they understand that expressive arts include art, dance, music, and drama.  
• Number of youth who reported that they have interest in expressive arts.

Method: Survey 

Timeline: Immediately post program

Outcome: Medium Term (4-H Expressive Arts) 

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they practiced or applied creative, artistic, or performance skills learned in 4-H in other areas of life. 
• Number of youth who reported that they have used knowledge and/or skills gained to complete a project or activity in expressive arts.

Method: Survey  

Timeline: End of Program Year 

Outcome: Long Term (4-H Expressive Arts)

Indicator: Long-term evaluation will be conducted using the National 4-H Index Study.

Method: Survey  

Timeline: 1+ years 

Outcome: Short Term (SET Programs) 

Indicator: Number of youth who reported that they learned critical thinking skills in SET programs/projects.

Method: Survey 

Timeline: Immediately post program 

Outcome: Medium Term (SET Programs)

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they can apply critical thinking skills that they learned in SET programs/projects in other areas of their life.   
• Number of youth who reported that they have used knowledge and/or skills gained to complete a SET project.  

Method: Survey 

Timeline: End of Program Year

Outcome: Long Term (SET Programs)

Indicator: Long-term evaluation will be conducted using the National 4-H Index Study. 

Method: Survey 

Timeline: 1+ years 

Outcome: Short Term 4-H Camp

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they take responsibility for their actions.   
• Number of youth who reported 4-H Camp improved their ability to manage their emotions. 

Method: Survey 

Timeline: End of Camp

 

Building Leadership Capacity 

 Adult

Outcome: Improved leadership skills. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people reporting improved leadership skills (e.g., facilitation, conflict management, communication).

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains)

Timeline: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation

Outcome: Knowledge gained through completing training programs. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people reporting enhanced knowledge of leadership concepts and practices (e.g. leadership styles, conflict resolution, team dynamics).

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains)

Timeline: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation

Outcome: Increased applied leadership knowledge for individuals serving in formal leadership roles. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people reporting improved applied leadership knowledge (e.g., governance, financial oversight, strategic planning) from participation in board, officer, or leadership training programs.

Method: Post-training surveys measuring knowledge gained in governance-related skills

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after training; follow-up conducted at three and six months to assess knowledge application 

Outcome: Increased participation in leadership roles by first-time leaders. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people taking on a leadership role for the first time as a result of Extension leadership programs.

Method: Post-participation survey (self-reported leadership involvement); follow-up evaluation with community partners.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion and follow up evaluation conducted at six months.

Outcome: Expanded leadership engagement among program participants. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people assuming new leadership roles (formal or informal) as a result of Extension leadership programs.

Method: Post-participation survey (self-reported leadership role adoption); annual follow-up tracking leadership retention.

Timeline: Initial survey collected at program completion; follow-up evaluation annually

Outcome: Giving time to serve in volunteer roles (e.g., KEHA or KALP members, Master programs, etc.). (initial)

Indicator: Number of people volunteering time to assist Extension or community activities and events (ex: KEHA or KALP members, Master programs, etc.)

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains)

Timeline: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation; also monthly, quarterly, or annual volunteer hour reports.

Outcome: Increased engagement via knowledge transfer through volunteer-led Extension programs. (initial)

Indicator: Number of participants who actively engaged in learning opportunities facilitated by trained Extension volunteers (e.g., KEHA or KALP members, Master programs).

Method: Post-event/program surveys measuring participant engagement and knowledge gained; volunteer reports tracking education interactions.

Timeline: Data collected immediately after each program/event.

Outcome: Increased confidence to lead. (intermediate)

Indicator: Number of people reporting increased confidence in their leadership abilities. 

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains); monitoring changes in local and state leadership positions.

Timeline: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation or via follow-up evaluation after six months.

Outcome: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation or via follow-up evaluation after six months.

Indicator: Number of volunteers addressing community issues by assessing needs, developing programs and/or implementing solutions.

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported participation in community issue resolution); documentation of volunteer-led initiatives.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program participation; follow-up evaluation conducted at 3 and 6 months.

 

Outcome: Leaders recruit and engage others to participate in projects. (intermediate)

Indicator: Number of people actively recruiting and engaging others to participate in community projects.

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported recruitment efforts); tracking participation in community-led projects.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conducted at three and six months.

Outcome: Increased mentorship opportunities within leadership programs. (intermediate)

Indicator: Number of people serving as mentors to emerging leaders..

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported mentorship engagement); follow-up with mentees and community partners.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conducted at six months.

Outcome: Engage leaders in local coalitions and organizations. (long-term)

Indicator: Number of individuals actively engaged in coalitions or organizations to address significant community issues.

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported recruitment efforts); tracking participation in coalitions and organizations.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conducted at three and six months.

Outcome: Implementation of strategies that improve community conditions. (long-term)

Indicator: Number of strategies reported as adopted and implemented to improve community conditions.

Method: Program reports, community partner documentation, and case studies tracking the implementation of strategies.

Timeline: Data collected through quarterly or annual reporting from program participants and community stakeholders.

Outcome: Increased community pride (long-term)

Indicator: Number of participants reporting a stronger sense of pride, identity, or community investment after engaging in Extension initiatives.

Method: Photos, documentation, post-program survey; follow up.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conduced at 3 and 6 months.

Survey Youth

Outcome: Short Term  

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they have identified personal strengths in leadership (including teamwork, responsibilities, communication, conflict resolution, problem solving, parliamentary procedure).  
• Number of youth who reported that they have set goals to serve in leadership roles.  
• Number of youth who reported that they are interested in serving as a leader. 

Method: Survey  

Timeline: After Program/ Activity Completion  

Outcome: Medium Term

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they applied leadership skills learned in 4-H (e.g., teamwork, responsibilities, communication, conflict resolution, problem solving, parliamentary procedure) to other areas of their life, such as at home, school, etc.  
• Number of youth who reported that they have served in leadership roles beyond the 4-H club or county level. 
• Number of youth who reported that they have used the skills learned in to plan and implement a workshop or activity.  

Method: Survey 

Timeline: At end of Club/Program Year  

Outcome: Long Term

Indicator: Long-term evaluation will be conducted using the National 4-H Index Study

Method: Survey  

Timeline: At least a year from participation

Learning Opportunities:

Small Farm Development 

 

Audience: Specialty Crop Growers 

Project or Activity: Programming for commercial or pre-commercial (training to be commercial growers) specialty crop production and management

Content or Curriculum: Publications, Fact Sheets, Workshops, Field Days, County Meetings, Regional Meetings, Field Visits, emails and phone calls 

Inputs: Extension Specialists, Kentucky Horticulture Council, USDA funding, Dept of Labor funding, county agents, KDA, professional member organizations, governmental agencies (NRCS, FSA, etc.) 

Dates: Annual

 

Audience: Non-commercial urban and community gardeners 

Project or Activity: Programming for specialty crop production and management that is non-commercial 

Content or Curriculum: Publications, Fact Sheets, Workshops, Field Days, County Meetings, Regional Meetings, Field Visits, emails and phone calls 

Inputs: Extension Specialists, Kentucky Horticulture Council, USDA funding, Dept of Labor funding, county agents, KDA, professional member organizations, community advocacy and faith-based groups, schools 

Dates: Ongoing[CH2] 

 

Learning Opportunities 

Connected & Resilient Communities  

 

Adult

Audience: Individuals

Project or Activity: Digital Literacy Initiatives

Content or Curriculum: Digital Literacy curriculum, Kentucky By the Numbers, CEDIK data profiles, publications, training, continuing education

Inputs: Programmatic materials, training, mentoring, paid staff, volunteers, community partners, non-profits, etc.

Date: Ongoing

 

Audience: Individuals

Project or Activity: Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Recovery

Content or Curriculum: EDEN materials, KHERN publications, trainings, continuing education

Inputs: Programmatic materials, paid staff, volunteers, community partners, etc.

Date: Ongoing

 

Audience: Communities

Project or Activity: Building Connection in Communities

Content or Curriculum: SPARK! toolkit, Placemaking Toolkit, Community Design publications, Community Arts publications, CLD publications, Building Community Pop-Up Toolkit, Creative Community Projects toolkit, Community Mural toolkit, Story Circles, curriculum, trainings, continuing education, Civic Engagement publications, Coalition and Network building publications

Inputs: Programmatic materials, paid staff, community partners, volunteers, etc.

Date: Ongoing

 

Youth

 Audience: 4-Hers, Professional Staff, Clientele 

Project or Activity: 4-H Issues Conference 

Content or Curriculum: Content or Curriculum: Curriculum is sourced from Shop 4-H and the Land Grant System, focuses on leadership, communication, and civic engagement. In addition to these sources are the vetted sources of iCivics.org, CommonSense.org, and PBS Learning Media. 

Inputs: These programs are supported by the research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system, funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc., local, state, and federal sources, grants, and the engagement of volunteers, youth, communities, and external stakeholders such as civic groups. 

Date: Fall  

 

Audience: 4-Hers, Professional Staff, & Clientele

Project or Activity: 4-H Civic Education 

Content or Curriculum: Curriculum is sourced from Shop 4-H and the Land Grant System, focuses on leadership, communication, and civic engagement. In addition to these sources are the vetted sources of iCivics.org, CommonSense.org, and PBS Learning Media, and Kentucky History Society

Inputs: These programs are supported by the research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system, funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc., local, state, and federal sources, grants, and the engagement of volunteers, youth, communities, and external stakeholders such as civic groups. 

Date: Program Year 

 

Audience: 4-Hers, Professional Staff, & Clientele

Project or Activity: 4-H Civic Education, Engagement, & Service

Content or Curriculum: Curriculum is sourced from Shop 4-H and the Land Grant System, focuses on leadership, communication, civic engagement, and service. In addition to these sources are the vetted sources of iCivics.org, CommonSense.org, and PBS Learning Media, US Citizenship & Immigration Services

Inputs: These programs are supported by the research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system, funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc., local, state, and federal sources, grants, and the engagement of volunteers, youth, communities, and external stakeholders such as civic groups. 

Date: Program Year 

 

Audience: 4-Hers, Extension Professionals, Clientele 

Project or Activity: Expressive Arts (Club/Group/Individual) 

Content or Curriculum: 4-H Create Art Now, 4-H Get Started in Art, 4-H My Favorite Things, Elements of Design, 4-H Fiber Arts, 4-H Leathercraft, 4-H Photography (1,2,3), and 4-H Theatre Arts (1,2,3) 

Inputs: These programs are supported by the research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system, funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc., local, state, and federal sources, grants, and the engagement of volunteers, youth, communities, and external stakeholders such as civic groups. Focus is on Grades 4-12.

Date: Program Year 

 

Audience: 4-Hers, Professional Staff, & Clientele

Project or Activity: 4-H Capitol Experience

Content or Curriculum: Curriculum is sourced from Shop 4-H and the Land Grant System, focuses on leadership, communication, civic engagement, and service. In addition to these sources are the vetted sources of 4-H Capitol Experience Handbook and Facilitator Guide, iCivics.org, CommonSense.org, and PBS Learning Media. 

Inputs: These programs are supported by the research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system, funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc., local, state, and federal sources, grants, and the engagement of volunteers, youth, communities, and external stakeholders such as civic groups.

Date: Winter 

 

Audience: 4-Hers, Extension Professionals, Clientele

Project or Activity: Kentucky 4-H Science, Engineering and Technology Programs: Tractor, Energy and Climate Project, Small Engine, Robotics, Computer Science, Rocketry

Content or Curriculum: 

1. Purdue 4-H Tractor Series Curriculum 
2. National 4-H The Power of Wind Curriculum, National 4-H Weather and Climate Curriculum National Energy Education Development (N.E.E.D.) Curriculum 
3. National 4-H Small Engine Curriculum  
4. National 4-H Junk Drawer Robotics Curriculum, Sphero.edu Web Based Curriculum, Ozobot and Ozoblockly Web Based Curriculum 
5. National 4-H Discovering Computer Science Curriculum, National 4-H WearTec Curriculum, Hour of Code Web Based Curriculum, University of Illinois 4-H Esports Curriculum, Apple Community Education Initiative 
6. National 4-H Aerospace Adventures Curriculum, NASA Educators Curriculum, National Association of Rocketry (NAR) 

Inputs: 

1. 4-H programs in energy usage and sources in which youth experience a sense of belonging, developmental relationships, explore their spark, and are actively engaged in opportunities that are meaningful.   
2. Educated 4-H Agents, Program assistants and volunteers in 4-H Petroleum Power Curriculum.  
3. Accredited volunteers in SET.  
4. Research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system.  
5. Funding opportunities from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc.  
6. Funding from local, state, and federal sources, and grants.  
7. Engagement of volunteers and youth in delivering the programs and leading clubs.  
8. Engagement of communities in identifying and implementing programming based on meeting local needs.   
9. External stakeholder engagement and support such as Tractor and Farm Equipment dealers and industries in Kentucky. 

Date: Program Year

 

Audience: Youth 

Project or Activity: 4-H Camp

Content or Curriculum: Curriculum is sourced from Shop 4-H, the Land Grant System and American Camp Association.

Inputs: These programs are supported by the research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system, funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc., local, state, and federal sources, grants, and the engagement of volunteers, youth, communities, and external stakeholders.  

Date: 4-H Program Year

 

Learning Opportunities 

Building Leadership Capacity  

 

Adult

Audience: Individuals

Project or Activity: Kentucky Extension Homemakers Association (KEHA)

Content or Curriculum: KEHA Leadership Academy, Homemakers Leader Lessons, Publications, Newsletters/News & Notes, Officer/Chairman training materials, KEHA State Meeting, various other resources and materials

Inputs: Programmatic materials, training, mentoring, paid staff, volunteers, community partners, non-profits, etc.

Dates: Ongoing

Audience: Individuals

Project or Activity: Kentucky Extension Leadership Development (KELD)

Content or Curriculum: KELD curriculum (e.g., Learning styles, communication essentials, teamwork, dealing with conflict, generational differences, SWOT analysis, etc.), Publications, other materials and expertise

Inputs: Programmatic materials, paid staff, community partners, volunteers, etc.

Dates: Ongoing

 

Audience: Individuals

Project or Activity: Kentucky Agricultural Leadership Program (KALP)

Content or Curriculum: KALP curriculum, Publications, other materials and expertise

Inputs: Programmatic materials, paid staff, external evaluators, community partners, volunteers, etc. 

Dates: Ongoing

 

Audience: Communities

Project or Activity: Supporting Citizen Engagement

Content or Curriculum: Creating Welcoming Communities, Becoming an Informed Citizen, Robert’s Rules Refresh, Youth & Adult Listening Sessions, KY Voter Education Resources, Engaging City Councils, Civic Engagement Through Voting, How To: Community Forums

Inputs: Programmatic materials, paid staff, community partners, volunteers, grant funds, local organizations and community partners, etc. 

Dates: Ongoing

 

Youth

Audience: Youth  

Project or Activity: 4-H Leadership Program

Content or Curriculum: Curriculum such as Leadership Skills you never outgrow is sourced from Shop 4-H and Ricochet: An Extreme 4-H Leadership Adventure is sourced from other Land Grant Systems. All curriculum pieces focus on leadership, communication, and civic engagement.

Inputs: In school clubs for middle and high school, after school clubs for teens, area ten councils, Middle school leadership clubs, and civic engagement opportunities. These programs are supported by the research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system, funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc., local, state, and federal sources, grants, and the engagement of volunteers, youth, communities, and external stakeholders such as civic groups. 

Dates: Summer  

 

Audience: Youth  

Project or Activity: Teen Conference

Content or Curriculum: Curriculum is sourced from Shop 4-H and the Land Grant System, focuses on leadership, communication, and civic engagement.

Inputs: These programs are supported by the research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system, funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc., local, state, and federal sources, grants, and the engagement of volunteers, youth, communities, and external stakeholders such as civic groups.

Dates: Summer  

 

Audience: Youth  

Project or Activity: 4-H Summit

Content or Curriculum: Curriculum is sourced from Shop 4-H and the Land Grant System, focuses on leadership, communication, and civic engagement.

Inputs: These programs are supported by the research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system, funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc., local, state, and federal sources, grants, and the engagement of volunteers, youth, communities, and external stakeholders such as civic groups.

Dates: Fall 

 

Audience: Youth 

Project or Activity: 4-H State Teen Council, Leadership Boards and Task Forces 

Content or Curriculum: Curriculum is sourced from Shop 4-H and the Land Grant System, focuses on leadership, communication, and civic engagement.

Inputs: These programs are supported by the research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system, funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc., local, state, and federal sources, grants, and the engagement of volunteers, youth, communities, and external stakeholders such as civic groups. 

Dates: Throughout the Program year

 

Audience: Youth  

Project or Activity: State 4-H Officer Program

Content or Curriculum: Curriculum is sourced from Shop 4-H and the Land Grant System, focuses on leadership, communication, and civic engagement. 

Inputs: These programs are supported by the research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system, funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc., local, state, and federal sources, grants, and the engagement of volunteers, youth, communities, and external stakeholders such as civic groups. 

Dates: Throughout the program year 

 

Audience: Youth  

Project or Activity: 4-H Camp Counselor Training (Teens) 

Content or Curriculum: Content in the Camp Volunteer Training Guide is sourced from the American Camp Association best practices and focuses on developmental needs of campers, safety considerations, operating procedures, age-appropriate behavior management, and camper supervision techniques.

Inputs: These trainings are supported by the research base of the American Camp Association with materials provided by the 4-H State Office, funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc., local, state, and federal sources, grants, and led by County Extension Staff responsible for 4-H Camp. 

Dates: Pre-Summer  

 

Audience: Youth  

Project or Activity: 4-H State Leadership Boards / Task Forces / Area Councils 

Content or Curriculum: Curriculum is sourced from Shop 4-H and the Land Grant System, focuses on leadership, communication, and civic engagement.

Inputs: These programs are supported by the research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system, funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc., local, state, and federal sources, grants, and the engagement of volunteers, youth, communities, and external stakeholders such as civic groups.

Dates: Throughout the Program Year

 

Audience: Youth  

Project or Activity: Achievement Program

Content or Curriculum: Curriculum is sourced from Shop 4-H and the Land Grant System, focuses on leadership, communication, and civic engagement. 

Inputs: These programs are supported by the research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system, funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc., local, state, and federal sources, grants, and the engagement of volunteers, youth, communities, and external stakeholders such as civic groups. 

Dates: Throughout the year

Evaluation:

Small Farm Development  

Outcome: Improved commercial production practices for specialty crops 

Indicators: 

• Number of producers who reported increased yield.  
• Number of new or beginning specialty crop growers. 
• Number of producers who reported improved produce quality. 
• Number of trained volunteers.
• Number of commercial growers who reported improved produce quality.
• Number of commercial growers who reported increased yield in specialty crops (fruit, vegetables, herbs, etc.).
• Number of commercial growers who reported that they expanded or developed new markets for specialty crops. 
• Number of commercial specialty crop growers who reported adoption of new technologies (acquisition of greenhouse, high tunnel, lighting, etc.)
• Number of commercial specialty crop growers who reported improved management practices (soil sampling, foliar sampling, integrated pest management, cover cropping, etc.)
• Number of commercial specialty crop growers who reported reduced production inputs/costs.

Method: Grower survey, direct observation and feedback 

Timeline: ongoing 

Outcome: Increased application of recommended horticultural practices for non-commercial production 

Indicators: 

• Number of people that implemented environmental stewardship. 
• Number of people that reduced pesticide applications. 
• Number of community members utilizing the sites and/or amount of produce donated from sites. 
• Number of trained volunteers. 
• Number of self-reported volunteer hours at community sites. 
• Number of producers who reported reduced production inputs/costs. 

Method: Interactions with clients, attendance at Extension educational events, direct observation and feedback 

Timeline: ongoing 

Connected & Resilient Communities  

Adult

Outcome: Increased knowledge of digital tools and online resources (short term)

Indicator: Number of participants demonstrating increased confidence or skills in using digital tools (e.g., online banking, telehealth, online applications, or virtual platforms) after completing Extension training programs

Method: Post-participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains).

Timeline: Collected immediately after program participation.

Outcome: Improved understanding of disaster preparedness and recovery strategies (short term)

Indicator: Number of participants who reported that they intend to develop an emergency plan or preparedness kit after completing an Extension disaster training.

Method: Pre- and post-training survey.

Timeline: Collected before and after each session.

Outcome: Increased understanding of cultural development and community identity (short term)

Indicator: Number of participants who reported increased understanding of the value of building local cultural assets such as foodways, arts, and heritage traditions.

Method: Reflection surveys and community feedback.

Timeline: Collected within 30 days of participation.

Outcome: More individuals adopt digital tools for work and daily life (intermediate)

Indicator: Number of communities that reported implementing at least one new strategy to strengthen digital inclusion (e.g., improved public Wi-Fi, device access programs, digital literacy workshops) as a result of Extension-supported initiatives.

Method: Follow-up survey at 3 and 6 months.

Timeline: Collected at program completion and 6 months post-program.

Outcome: Communities implement disaster preparedness and recovery strategies (int)

Indicator: Number of businesses, farms, or households reporting faster post-disaster recovery due to preparedness actions learned through Extension.

Method: Post-disaster community case studies and resilience tracking.

Timeline: Assessed following disaster events.

Outcome: More public spaces are revitalized for community engagement (int)

Indicator: Number of individuals who reported that they contributed to efforts to improve public spaces through design, revitalization, or development (e.g., parks, community gathering areas, public art, creative placemaking projects) as a direct result of Extension-supported initiatives.

Method: Site visits, surveys, photo documentation, and community feedback.

Timeline: Tracked annually.

Outcome: More individuals engage in local governance and civic groups (int)

Indicator: Number of participants who reported increased involvement in local governance, community groups, or public forums as a result of program participation.

Method: Participant self-reporting and organizational membership tracking.

Timeline: Follow-up at 6 and 12 months.

Outcome: Expanded partnerships enhance problem-solving and resource-sharing

Indicator 1: Number of communities or organizations securing external funding (grants, sponsorships, or resource investments) as a result of Extension support.

Indicator 2: Number of new collaborative networks, partnerships, or cross-sector initiatives developed to address local challenges as a result of Extension-supported programs.

Method: grant tracking, partners surveys, local reports

Timeline: annually

Outcome: increased participation in cultural and arts-based programs

Indicator: Number of participants in Extension arts or design-based community programs (e.g., story circles, murals, design charettes, creative placemaking) who reported increased connection or belonging.

Method: pre- and post- surveys from program participation,

Timeline: after program participation

Outcome:  Improved quality of life through connection and civic engagement

Indicator:  Number of participants who reported experiencing stronger ties to their community as a result of participating in Extension arts programming with others.

Method: pre- and post- surveys from program participation

Timeline: after program participation

Outcome: Increased ability to access, interpret, and apply data for informed decision-making (initial).

Indicator: Number of participants reporting increased confidence in accessing, interpreting, and applying data to inform local decision-making.

Method: Self-reported surveys collected after data literacy training sessions, Agent documentation of community plans, grant applications, or policy discussions that reference data profiles.

Timeline: after program or training participation

Youth

Outcome: Short Term (Civic Education/Global Education)

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they identified community needs.  
• Number of youth who expressed interest in expanding their knowledge of other cultures.  
• Number of youth who reported that they can identify aspects of their own culture.  
• Number of youth who reported that they can name one responsibility they have as a citizen.  
• Number of youth who report increased confidence interacting with others as a result of their participation in Extension arts activities.

Method: Survey 

Timeline: Immediately post program

Outcome: Medium Term (Civic Education/Global Education) 

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they used the skills learned to plan and facilitate a service project. 
• Number of youth who reported that they can communicate to others an aspect of their own culture.  
• Number of youth who reported that they can explain one responsibility they have as a citizen.

Method: Survey 

Timeline: End of Program Year

Outcome: Long Term (Civic Education/Global Education)

Indicator: Long-term evaluation will be conducted using the National 4-H Index Study. 

Method: Survey 

Timeline: 1+ year

Outcome: Short Term (4-H Expressive Arts)

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they understand that expressive arts include art, dance, music, and drama.  
• Number of youth who reported that they have interest in expressive arts.

Method: Survey 

Timeline: Immediately post program

Outcome: Medium Term (4-H Expressive Arts) 

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they practiced or applied creative, artistic, or performance skills learned in 4-H in other areas of life. 
• Number of youth who reported that they have used knowledge and/or skills gained to complete a project or activity in expressive arts.

Method: Survey  

Timeline: End of Program Year 

Outcome: Long Term (4-H Expressive Arts)

Indicator: Long-term evaluation will be conducted using the National 4-H Index Study.

Method: Survey  

Timeline: 1+ years 

Outcome: Short Term (SET Programs) 

Indicator: Number of youth who reported that they learned critical thinking skills in SET programs/projects.

Method: Survey 

Timeline: Immediately post program 

Outcome: Medium Term (SET Programs)

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they can apply critical thinking skills that they learned in SET programs/projects in other areas of their life.   
• Number of youth who reported that they have used knowledge and/or skills gained to complete a SET project.  

Method: Survey 

Timeline: End of Program Year

Outcome: Long Term (SET Programs)

Indicator: Long-term evaluation will be conducted using the National 4-H Index Study. 

Method: Survey 

Timeline: 1+ years 

Outcome: Short Term 4-H Camp

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they take responsibility for their actions.   
• Number of youth who reported 4-H Camp improved their ability to manage their emotions. 

Method: Survey 

Timeline: End of Camp

 

Building Leadership Capacity 

 Adult

Outcome: Improved leadership skills. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people reporting improved leadership skills (e.g., facilitation, conflict management, communication).

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains)

Timeline: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation

Outcome: Knowledge gained through completing training programs. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people reporting enhanced knowledge of leadership concepts and practices (e.g. leadership styles, conflict resolution, team dynamics).

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains)

Timeline: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation

Outcome: Increased applied leadership knowledge for individuals serving in formal leadership roles. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people reporting improved applied leadership knowledge (e.g., governance, financial oversight, strategic planning) from participation in board, officer, or leadership training programs.

Method: Post-training surveys measuring knowledge gained in governance-related skills

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after training; follow-up conducted at three and six months to assess knowledge application 

Outcome: Increased participation in leadership roles by first-time leaders. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people taking on a leadership role for the first time as a result of Extension leadership programs.

Method: Post-participation survey (self-reported leadership involvement); follow-up evaluation with community partners.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion and follow up evaluation conducted at six months.

Outcome: Expanded leadership engagement among program participants. (initial)

Indicator: Number of people assuming new leadership roles (formal or informal) as a result of Extension leadership programs.

Method: Post-participation survey (self-reported leadership role adoption); annual follow-up tracking leadership retention.

Timeline: Initial survey collected at program completion; follow-up evaluation annually

Outcome: Giving time to serve in volunteer roles (e.g., KEHA or KALP members, Master programs, etc.). (initial)

Indicator: Number of people volunteering time to assist Extension or community activities and events (ex: KEHA or KALP members, Master programs, etc.)

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains)

Timeline: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation; also monthly, quarterly, or annual volunteer hour reports.

Outcome: Increased engagement via knowledge transfer through volunteer-led Extension programs. (initial)

Indicator: Number of participants who actively engaged in learning opportunities facilitated by trained Extension volunteers (e.g., KEHA or KALP members, Master programs).

Method: Post-event/program surveys measuring participant engagement and knowledge gained; volunteer reports tracking education interactions.

Timeline: Data collected immediately after each program/event.

Outcome: Increased confidence to lead. (intermediate)

Indicator: Number of people reporting increased confidence in their leadership abilities. 

Method: Post participation survey (self-assessment of learning gains); monitoring changes in local and state leadership positions.

Timeline: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation or via follow-up evaluation after six months.

Outcome: Survey will be collected immediately after program participation or via follow-up evaluation after six months.

Indicator: Number of volunteers addressing community issues by assessing needs, developing programs and/or implementing solutions.

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported participation in community issue resolution); documentation of volunteer-led initiatives.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program participation; follow-up evaluation conducted at 3 and 6 months.

 

Outcome: Leaders recruit and engage others to participate in projects. (intermediate)

Indicator: Number of people actively recruiting and engaging others to participate in community projects.

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported recruitment efforts); tracking participation in community-led projects.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conducted at three and six months.

Outcome: Increased mentorship opportunities within leadership programs. (intermediate)

Indicator: Number of people serving as mentors to emerging leaders..

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported mentorship engagement); follow-up with mentees and community partners.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conducted at six months.

Outcome: Engage leaders in local coalitions and organizations. (long-term)

Indicator: Number of individuals actively engaged in coalitions or organizations to address significant community issues.

Method: Post-program survey (self-reported recruitment efforts); tracking participation in coalitions and organizations.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conducted at three and six months.

Outcome: Implementation of strategies that improve community conditions. (long-term)

Indicator: Number of strategies reported as adopted and implemented to improve community conditions.

Method: Program reports, community partner documentation, and case studies tracking the implementation of strategies.

Timeline: Data collected through quarterly or annual reporting from program participants and community stakeholders.

Outcome: Increased community pride (long-term)

Indicator: Number of participants reporting a stronger sense of pride, identity, or community investment after engaging in Extension initiatives.

Method: Photos, documentation, post-program survey; follow up.

Timeline: Survey collected immediately after program completion; follow-up conduced at 3 and 6 months.

Survey Youth

Outcome: Short Term  

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they have identified personal strengths in leadership (including teamwork, responsibilities, communication, conflict resolution, problem solving, parliamentary procedure).  
• Number of youth who reported that they have set goals to serve in leadership roles.  
• Number of youth who reported that they are interested in serving as a leader. 

Method: Survey  

Timeline: After Program/ Activity Completion  

Outcome: Medium Term

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they applied leadership skills learned in 4-H (e.g., teamwork, responsibilities, communication, conflict resolution, problem solving, parliamentary procedure) to other areas of their life, such as at home, school, etc.  
• Number of youth who reported that they have served in leadership roles beyond the 4-H club or county level. 
• Number of youth who reported that they have used the skills learned in to plan and implement a workshop or activity.  

Method: Survey 

Timeline: At end of Club/Program Year  

Outcome: Long Term

Indicator: Long-term evaluation will be conducted using the National 4-H Index Study

Method: Survey  

Timeline: At least a year from participation