Campbell County CES

County Emphasis:

Enhancing Agriculture, Natural Resources, and Horticulture Sustainability

Concentration 1:

Food Safety, Quality, and Access

Concentration 2:

Animal Production and Management

Concentration 3:

Plant Production and Management

Concentration 4:

Sustainability, Natural Resources and Wildlife Management, and Environment

Situation:

Kentucky’s animal production strategies emphasize sustainability, animal health, and economic viability. Beef cattle convert over 7 million acres of pasture into valuable products, while Extension supports efficient grazing and resource management.

The state’s diverse livestock sector includes:

•    Equine: As the Horse Capital of the World, Kentucky leads in breeding and excellence.

•    Swine: Producers focus on efficiency and strict biosecurity.

•    Small Ruminants: Goats and sheep thrive on pasture-based systems, emphasizing health and nutrition.

•    Poultry: The state’s top ag industry, with both commercial broilers and small flock production.

To sustain productivity, CES will continue providing need-based education, new technology, and updated management practices for all species.

As Kentucky’s farm numbers decline and the average age of producers rises, youth engagement in agriculture is more vital than ever. Extension programs help youth build life skills, responsibility, and knowledge through animal and plant science projects. According to the 2023 Needs Assessment, key youth priorities include workforce readiness, food access, and agricultural literacy.

Youth gain hands-on experience in animal care, business skills, and food systems through 4-H, preparing them to address modern challenges like climate variability, rising costs, and evolving consumer demand.

Sustainable crop production is crucial as Kentucky farmers navigate economic and environmental pressures. Producers are adopting data-driven, conservation-focused strategies—such as crop rotation, cover cropping, and remote sensing—to optimize yield and soil health.

Extension promotes diversified crops, climate-adapted varieties, integrated pest management, and disaster readiness. Programming includes field days, online resources, and support for local food systems and specialty crops.

Youth education in plant and soil science is essential for future agricultural innovation. 4-H plant science projects develop youth knowledge and life skills, aligning with 2023 statewide priorities like nutrition access, ag literacy, and workforce preparation.

CES works to expand access to fresh produce while teaching youth and families how to grow, prepare, and preserve food. Partnerships with agencies like KY Farm to School and KY Dept. of Ag help promote healthy eating and reduce diet-related diseases.

Kentucky’s forests cover 50% of the state, contributing $13 billion annually to the economy. But pressures from development, invasive species, and climate change threaten long-term sustainability. Extension supports landowners with management tools to conserve water, soil, and wildlife habitats in both urban and rural areas.

With increased risks to Kentucky’s natural resources, educating youth in environmental science is critical. 4-H helps build environmental literacy and encourages stewardship through hands-on projects in forestry, wildlife, and sustainability. The 2024 4-H Index shows strong youth interest in science, with 62% considering science careers.

By equipping young people with knowledge and leadership skills, Extension prepares a new generation to care for Kentucky’s environment and natural resources.

County Situation:

Input provided by the Community Needs Assessments and Advisory Council Members indicate a need for these programming focuses in the next 5 year plan of work: invasive species education and management, recycling / composting / solid waste education and management, hiking / trail passport utilization and support, arboriculture / forestry education and management, youth engagement with natural resources.  Horticulture’s next 5 year plan of work will focus on the following areas: horticulture sustainability, local food access, engaging youth in horticulture programs, and providing resources to fruit and vegetable growers.  In addition, providing soil samples, diagnostics tools and resources for home and commercial growers. With this information, growers will implement BMP’s to their garden or farm. 

Campbell County is located in the northernmost section of Kentucky and is bordered on the west by the Licking River and on the north and east by the Ohio River. Campbell County consists of approximately 95,360 acres, of which 38,774 is classified as farmland. This amount is in 493 farms averaging approximately 79 acres per farm. The soils within the county are basically Eden clay loam with approximately 60,000 acres with slopes between 12 and 35%. Due of the steepness of the land, cultivated crops are limited to a small number of acres with most land being best suited for pasture or hay. Campbell County ranks ninth in the state in population (93,702) with 85% of the county’s residents living in urban communities. Traditional agriculture production in the county includes beef cattle, forages (includes some cash hay), grain (corn/soybeans), equine (breeding, boarding, training), small ruminants (sheep, goats, hogs) and poultry. Non-traditional crops include honey (beekeeping), Christmas trees, grapes and other horticultural crops. Based on 2022 agriculture census data, Campbell County’s agriculture production included: Beef Cattle and calves- 4,811, Hogs- 91, Sheep- 434, Poultry- 2,519, Corn acres- 397, Soybeans acres- 397, Alfalfa hay acres- 400, All other hay acres- 8,095.

Of the 493 operating farms, 97% are family owned farms, 80% are fully owned with 37% being owned and operated by females. 57% of Campbell County farms are one person operated, 38% are two person operated and 5% have 3 or more operators. The average age of the principal farm operator is 58 years old. It is estimated that 78% of all farmers have access to the internet. Of the 93,702 population 84.8 % are white, 2.5% black, 1.9% hispanic, and 4% other. 53% are female and 47% are male. 10.1% of adults are diabetic, 23.7% of adults smoke, 28.1% of adults are obese. Within the farming population, 1 reported as Black/ African American, 948 White, 3 reported as more than one race and 11 Hispanic/Latino/Spanish origin. 

Campbell County is part of the Greater Cincinnati Metropolitan area which has in place an extensive air, highway, rail and water transportation system. There are over two million people within a 20-mile radius of Campbell County. These resources coupled with a high per capita income consumer base, provides Campbell County farmers with a tremendous opportunity to market agriculture products locally. Campbell County ‘s strengths are based on our diverse population, tourist destinations, existing and potential markets and a diverse production of agriculture products. Based on the interest in buying locally grown foods from a large urban population, there is tremendous opportunity for farmers to expand into value-added products, agritourism, grower’s coops, and alternative markets. 

In recent years there has been an increased interest in poultry production, especially for egg production. Campbell County has also seen growth in horse boarding and training facilities due to the development of horse trails and youth and adult horse clubs. Agritourism is vibrant in Campbell County. County activities such as Campbell County Backroads Farm Tour help promote agriculture in Campbell County as well as connect urban citizens directly to on-farm activities and markets. Direct marketing of freezer beef has greatly increased (partially caused by covid) and farmers are selling freezer beef direct to consumers. Number of animals sold as freezer beef range from 2 to 3 per farm per year to as many as 150 individual animals from one local farmer. 

Campbell County has an underutilized forage base that, if managed correctly, could provide increased income to farmers. Increased revenues are possible with implementation of best management practices. By increasing our forage capacity revenues from increased beef cattle and other grazing animal numbers and cash hay enterprises- improved profits are attainable. 

One of Campbell County’s greatest weaknesses is its lack of tillable land. Much of our land is too steep to cultivate and has limited productivity due to its high clay content and shallow depth of topsoil. Even though there is a diversity of agriculture production in the county, many farmers are reluctant to make changes in their farming operations that could improve profitability. Educational programs and on-farm field demonstrations are needed to show alternative agriculture opportunities. The following issues and concerns have been identified as challenges for agriculture production in Campbell County: distance to traditional livestock markets, harvesting facilities, bulk agricultural lime, access to local markets and large animal veterinary care, high price of land, lack of availability of large tracts of land, lack of large animal vets, aging farming population, input costs, available farm labor, lack of farm estate and succession planning and the lack of understanding of the importance of agriculture by our urban citizens. Invasive species such as honeysuckle bush and Johnson grass are of major concern in the county. Best management practices for these and other species need to be in place to reduce the impact of invasive species on production agriculture. There is a need for more public water and broadband internet access in the county. Lack of public knowledge about the importance of agriculture continues to threaten existing farming operations. While Campbell County has not experienced as rapid an urban growth as neighboring counties, we nonetheless will continue to see urban development encroaching on agriculture enterprises. This will and has impacted traditional county agriculture in several ways. Land values have escalated to the point where their cost is prohibitive for potential producers to initiate new farming enterprises or existing farmers to expand. As urban expansion escalates, environmental concerns will become more of an issue. This also increases the population of people separated from the farm which increases the need for agriculture awareness education to the non-farming community.

The census data, community needs assessment, and the local Agriculture agencies such as the Campbell County: Cooperative Extension Service, County Extension Council, Community Needs Assessment Forums, County Agriculture Council, Conservation District, Cattleman’s Association, County Ag Development Board, Farmland Workgroup, Farm Bureau, Farm Service Agency, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Northern Kentucky Horse Network and local agribusinesses, all work closely to improve the productivity and profitability of Campbell County’s agriculture community while conserving the county’s natural resources. These groups identified and prioritized the needs of Campbell County agriculture and tasked Campbell County Agriculture & Natural Resources Extension with requests to provide programming in the following areas. Livestock and forage production (beef cattle, equine, small ruminants and poultry) are all high priorities but, specifically requested were beef and forage education focusing on best management practices to increase production/efficiency, reduce costs, improved farm management and marketing skills while improving the stewardship of our natural resources. This included programming (classroom, field days, demonstrations, etc) to increase weaning weights, shorten calving and breeding windows, increase reproductive efficiency, improve health and nutrition, record keeping showing improvements in profitability and farm financial stability, reduced expenses on farm inputs, long term improvement in farms natural resources such as soil and water, reduced environmental impact, improved genetics of beef herd, improved forage production (rotational grazing, seeding techniques, fertilization, use of legumes), increased farm income, rotational grazing system, decreased winter feed costs/wastage, improved animal health, utilizing alternative marketing opportunities. Additionally, there is a need for equine educational programs in the areas of nutrition/health, forages, housing, riding/showing, training and general horsemanship to address the needs of the average horse owner. 

These key agriculture leadership groups also identified the need to raise the awareness of the general public about the importance of agriculture and locally-produced foods, and for Extension to continue working with youth and young adults to learn about careers in agriculture and support these individuals in starting new agriculture careers/enterprises to sustain agricultural economic growth in Campbell County and enhance the economic viability of the family farm. 

Long-Term Outcomes:

•    Individuals and families of all incomes levels have access to affordable and nutritious foods

•    Family farms become economically viable.

•    Kentucky’s local food and agriculture industry are thriving.

•    Decrease in the number of Kentuckians with chronic health conditions such as diabetes, obesity and cardiovascular disease.

•    More Kentuckians routinely met the guidelines for the consumption of (locally-grown) fresh fruits and vegetables.

•    Youth report reduced risk for poor health, developmental delays, obesity, and malnutrition.    

•    Youth increase educational outcomes.  

•    Youth decrease poor overall health. 

•     Economic, social, physical, or environmental situations that will change because individuals or communities adopted new (or improved existing) actions, practices, and behaviors (these also take time to mature)). 

•    Forests ecosystem and economic values are enhanced, resulting in healthier forests, improved water quality, and increased revenue? 

•    Wildlife habitat is increased and improved. 

•    The sustainability of agricultural and forestry operations is increased and opportunities for further growth are improved. 

•    Youth will advocate for natural resources in their communities.??? 

•    Youth will be life and work ready, contributing to the natural resources community as consumers, leaders, and innovators.?? 

•    Youth actively adopt and apply advanced natural resources practices, demonstrating a growing commitment to the natural resources community.?

•    Increase the quality and number of animals or pounds of milk produced annually contributing to the increased and more stable financial position for producers.? 

•    Increase the use of sustainable management practices across all production methods and species.? 

•    Producers are routinely implementing guidelines and recommendations for efficient and financially sound production demonstrating sustainable behavior change.? 

•    Continually implementing new technology and production practices.? 

•    Improve the quality of life of animals and humans.

•    Increase the quality of beef cattle produced annually contributing to increased and more stable financial position of cattle operations. 

•    Increase the use of sustainable management practices across all production methods leading to enhanced production efficiency and reductions in the carbon footprint. 

•    Producers are routinely following Beef Quality Care & Assurance standards to produce healthy and high-quality beef. 

•    Continually adoption of new technology and production practices.

•    Increase the use of sustainable management practices by horse owners. 

•    Horse owners will be encouraged to apply best management practices for the care and management of their horses to help control cost of ownership.  

•    Increase the quality of small ruminants annually contributing to increased and more stable financial position of small ruminant operations. 

•    Youth will make informed decisions regarding agricultural products and services.

•    Youth will advocate for agriculture and sustainable fiber and food production in their communities.

•    Youth will be life and work ready, contributing to the agricultural community as consumers, leaders, and innovators.

•    Achieve long-term sustainability and resilience through the widespread adoption of practices that enhance soil productivity, conserve water, and optimize resource use, leading to resilient agricultural systems capable of withstanding economic and environmental fluctuations.

•    Strengthen local economies through improved farm sustainability and profitability, which are economic multipliers in local communities. Helping farm families successfully transition to subsequent generations. Helping new and beginning farmers enter farming operations.  

•    Strengthen local economies through the continuous support of farmer’s markets, community gardens, and community-supported agriculture programs that are well-integrated with urban horticulture initiatives.

•    Develop and implement a comprehensive framework for disaster readiness and climate adaptation that includes advanced forecasting, crop selection, and management practices to prepare for extreme weather events.

•    Improved crop sustainability, increased farm profitability and reduced environmental impact using best disease management practices

•    Reduced unnecessary pesticide exposure to farmers, agribusiness and the general public

•    Increased farm productivity because of a reduction in yield and quality losses due to diseases

•    Increased competitiveness for U.S. farmers and the agricultural industry

•    Achieve long-term sustainability and resilience in agricultural practices through the widespread adoption of practices that enhance soil productivity, conserve water quality and quantity, and optimize resource use, leading to resilient agricultural systems capable of withstanding economic and environmental fluctuations.

•    Strengthening local economies through improved farm sustainability and profitability, which are economic multipliers in local communities. Helping farm families successfully transition to subsequent generations. Helping new and beginning farmers enter farming operations. Helping to maintain or increase domestic markets and increase export markets for grain crops and tobacco by improving quality of commodities compared to that of foreign competitors.  

•    Helping to educate turfgrass managers on how to maintain surfaces that meet the needs of their desired uses while improving economic and environmental benefits of turfgrasses.

•    Work with farmers and those interested in farming on generational succession in farms to improve sustainability of the farms for generations.

•    Develop and implement a comprehensive framework for disaster readiness and climate adaptation that includes advanced forecasting, crop selection, and management practices to prepare for extreme weather events.

Intermediate Outcomes:

•    Increase and/or strengthen statewide and regional partnership to address community food system issues.

•    Increased production of Kentucky-grown food and increased market opportunities for those products.

•    Increase in the number of farmers’ markets and local food retailers that accept one or more food benefits as payment.

•    Improved dietary habits through: consumption of more fruits and vegetables, a variety of proteins and the number of meals prepared at home.

•    Increased number of entrepreneurial food businesses.

•    Youth will practice making wise nutrition choices.  

•    Youth will practice food safety.  

•    Youth will access nutritious foods.  

•    Youth will prepare nutritious foods.  

•    Youth will eat a variety of healthy foods daily.

•    New or improved practices, behaviors, or choices that will occur in participants or communities because of the knowledge or awareness they gained from their contact with Extension (these are behavior change outcomes that are typically measured in follow-up evaluations because they require time to mature.) 

•    Actively install and use resource monitoring technology to assist in data-driven decision to monitor their forest’s health forest health, water resources, and land usage.  

•    Increase the number of Woodland owners that participate in economic incentives programs adopting sustainable forestry, water conservation, and soil management practices.  

•    Implement climate resilience strategies to withstand the increasing frequency of extreme weather events, sustainable water management, and adapting wildlife management to preserve biodiversity under changing climate conditions. 

•    Youth will take responsible action in natural resources conservation.

•    Youth will aspire to explore careers in natural resources and environmental sciences.

•    Youth will practice skills gained from 4-H natural resources projects and clubs.

•    Youth will communicate natural resources ideas and concepts more effectively.

•    Annually implement strategies and production methods that result in increased efficiency, and number of animals produced /maintained, and animals harvested or pounds of milk produced.

•    Increased biosecurity strategies that promote both animal and human health related behaviors for a safe food system.

•    Increase or strengthen partnerships or relationships with commodity groups to address sustainable management strategies, health-focused care, and economic viability for all livestock.

•    Annually evaluate how they care for and manage their horses using cost effective strategies. 

•    Consider how they can use good biosecurity practices to ensure the health of their horses.  

•    Youth will practice skills gained from 4-H agricultural projects and clubs.

•    Youth will communicate agricultural ideas and concepts more effectively.

•    Youth actively adopt and apply advanced agricultural practices, demonstrating a growing commitment to the agricultural community.

•    Continue development and dissemination of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) practices by specialists and agents to educate producers and promote IPM practices and/or organic practices that reduce chemical inputs while maintaining crop health and productivity.

•    Expansion of Extension programming by broadening the scope of extension services to include more comprehensive support for agronomic and horticultural crops and forages suited to Kentucky's changing climate and soil conditions.

•    Explore the use of emerging production technologies to achieve increased adoption of technologies such as monitoring crop productivity, crop quality, soil health, and soil moisture levels across Kentucky's agricultural sectors.

•    Adoption of improved pesticide safety practices

•    Increased adoption of effective crop protection (i.e. IPM) methods by stakeholders to manage diseases

•    Increased number of stakeholders who scout for diseases, monitor disease risk factors, and use research-based information

•    Early identification of potential disease outbreaks and awareness of disease trends

•    Judicious use of pesticide-based disease management

•    Expansion of Extension programming by broadening the scope of extension services to include more comprehensive support for grain crops, forages, tobacco, hemp, and turfgrass suited to Kentucky's changing climate and soil conditions.

•    Explore the use of emerging production technologies to achieve increased adoption of technologies for such things as monitoring crop productivity, crop quality, soil health and soil moisture levels across Kentucky's agricultural sectors.

•    Adoption of improved pesticide application practices.  Improve understanding and compliance with state pesticide applicator regulations.

•    Proper implementation of technologies to help farmers, crop consultants, and pesticide applicators monitor, document, plant, harvest, and manage crops and forages. Technologies can include, but are not limited to, global navigation systems, section controls, applicator maps, soil sampling maps, yield maps, unmanned aerial vehicles, genetic traits, data analysis, etc.

Initial Outcomes:

•    Increased awareness of and use of Food Connection Programs: Value Chain Coordinators, TFC Learning Kitchen, and Cultivate KY resources.

•    Increased awareness of Extension resources and programs supporting food access.

•    Improved skills related to safe food preparation and food preservation.

•    Increased participation in Homebased Microprocessing workshops.

•    Increased awareness and accessibility of community resources available to access fresh foods.

•    Increase the number of partnerships and/or coalitions involved in promoting awareness of local food systems, healthy eating, and active living (e.g. Program councils, Health Advisory Boards, etc.).

•    Youth will learn how to make wise nutrition choices.  

•    Youth will learn the importance of food safety.  

•    Youth learn how to access nutritious foods.  

•    Youth will learn how to prepare nutritious foods.  

•    Youth will aspire to eat a variety of healthy foods daily.

•    Increase the awareness of sustainable forest management practices, economic pressures and technological barriers facing woodland owners and other interested individuals.  

•    Increase knowledge and skills of individuals in both urban and rural settings to address immediate wildlife-related challenges and enhance biodiversity.  

•    Develop the skills and ability of Woodland owners and Ag producers to actively manage wildlife-related damage and nuisance. 

•    Develop emergency preparedness and response strategies focusing on preserving their Woodlands and mitigating immediate damage from events such as floods and tornadoes. 

•    Youth will explore their spark in natural resources.

•    Youth will gain knowledge and develop skills in natural resources and environmental sciences.

•    Youth will understand how their actions and choices impact natural resources and the environment.

•    Youth will set goals to become good stewards of natural resources.

•    Youth will expand life and work readiness skills, gaining awareness of the diverse opportunities within the field of natural resources.

Animal production and management strategies encompass but are not limited to sustainable practices, health-focused care, and economic viability across all species. Activities will include programs to address and improve specific management systems and introduce new and emerging techniques, technology, and production systems for increased efficiency and profitability. 

•    Increase knowledge about sustainable and economically viable management practices

•    Increase skills related to efficient production methods across all species.

•    Increase confidence in implementing new and emerging techniques, technology, and production systems.

•    Increase confidence in making decisions related to promoting animal health-related behavior.

•    Increase intentions to employ financially sound behavior regarding production methods, use of financial tools, health-focused care, and the human-animal interaction.

Horses are kept primarily for sport and recreation. The majority of CES clientele can be placed in one of three general categories: 1) the new or first-time owner. These owners may have recently purchased a horse or have taken over full-time care of their horse, 2) Horse owners that have experience but are looking to validate what they do to make sure they are on the right track, and 3) the long time horse owner who is looking to improve management of their horses. 

•    Horse owners will evaluate current practices and see where changes might be of benefit. 

•    New horse owners can implement the management practices that fit their needs as new horse owners.  

•    Long time horse owners can see the new technologies and management practices that may benefit their horse operations.  

•    Improve management skills to improve sustainability and reduce cost of ownership. 

•    Youth will explore their spark in agriculture.

•    Youth will gain knowledge and develop skills in agriculture.

•    Youth will develop a greater awareness and appreciation for the impact of agriculture in their daily life. 

•    Youth will expand life and work readiness skills in agriculture, gaining awareness of the diverse opportunities within the field of agriculture.

•    Increase adoption of data-driven practices through immediate trainings, workshops, and field visits to educate producers on the latest data-driven agricultural technologies, focusing on efficient resource utilization, pest resistance, and yield improvements.

•    Enhanced soil and water management programs by rolling out targeted extension programs that focus on soil health and water management techniques to immediately improve crop yield potentials.

•    Support for crop trials by initiating pilot projects that support the planting of diverse crops and horticultural species, such as vegetables, small fruit, tree fruit, herbs, and ornamental plants to assess short-term viability and consumer interest.

•    Initial and continuing education opportunities for certified pesticide applicators

•    Stakeholders have knowledge and tools needed to better protect crops from diseases and to understand the benefits of adopting best disease management practices and resistance mitigation

•    Stakeholders are more aware of current and new and/or emerging disease issues

•    Stakeholders have access to timely diagnostics to avoid or reduce the impact of disease outbreaks

•    Stakeholders are more aware of UK plant pathology research and resources

•    Increase adoption of data-driven practices through immediate trainings, workshops, and field visits to educate producers on the latest data-driven agricultural technologies, focusing on efficient resource utilization, pest resistance, sustainability, and yield improvements.

•    Enhanced soil and water management programs by rolling out targeted extension programs that focus on soil and water management techniques to immediately improve crop yield potentials and promote environmentally favorable practices.

•    Support for diverse crop trials by initiating pilot projects that support the planting of diverse crops.

•    Fulfillment of annual GAP Training requirements for GAP Certification of tobacco producers.

•    Facilitate trainings to provide necessary knowledge to support those desiring to obtain commercial and non-commercial applicator licenses and maintain CEUs from the Kentucky Department of Agriculture in the turf and ornamental category.

•    Assisting farmers who need to document specific climate objectives and/or management practices of grain and tobacco buyers.

Evaluation:

Adult

Outcome: Increased awareness of wildlife, forestry, and natural resources issues 

Indicator: 

• Number of participants who reported that they gained knowledge of wildlife. 

• Number of participants who reported they gained their awareness of forestry. 

• Number of participants who reported they gained their awareness of natural resources.   

Method: Survey (Self-Assessment of Learning Gains) 

Timeline: At program 

Outcome: Increased management to address resources concerns 

Indicator: 

• Number of participants who reported that they developed new management plans. 

• Number of participants who reported an increase in the acres managed. 

• Number of participants (or state agencies) who reported that they implemented wildlife damage management practices  

Method: Follow-up Survey (Survey previous participants) and tracking number of management plans implemented by state agencies 

Timeline: Annually 

Outcome: Increased understanding of invasive arthropod identification 

Indicator: 

• Number of learners that report knowledge gain in identification skills 

• Number of attendees that report knowledge gain in differentiating native and non-native arthropods (and close relatives) 

Method: In person survey  

Timeline: Immediately following Extension event 

Outcome: Greater understanding of reporting invasive species to appropriate agencies 

Indicator: 

• Number of people self-reporting knowledge gain on how to properly report a sighting of an invasive insect, arachnid, or mollusk 

• Number of people reporting behavioral changes in reporting and in support of invasive species monitoring methods 

Method: In person survey and year later survey 

Timeline: In person surveys at Extension event and digital surveys distributed one year later 

Outcome: Increased awareness of and use of safe/effective pesticide application methods 

Indicator: 

• Number of certified applicators attending continuing education credit Extension events (both private and commercial) 

• Number of people self-reporting knowledge gain on integrated pest management techniques  

• Number of people self-reporting behavioral changes regarding risk mitigation strategies for pesticide application 

Method: Surveys at CEU events 

Timeline:   Annually

Outcome: Improved skills related to safe food preparation and food preservation. (initial)

Indicator: 

• Number of individuals who reported increasing their knowledge, skills, or intentions regarding the safe storage, handling, preparation and/or preservation of food through Extension programs and resources.  

• Number of individuals who reported supplementing their diets with healthy foods that they grew, harvested, or preserved (e.g. community or backyard gardens, fishing, hunting). 

Method: Pre/post participant evaluations from: NEP agent-led curricula, Champion Food Volunteer, Food Preservation.

Timeline: Post-program/curricula survey administration; annual fiscal year (food system impact survey)

Outcome: Increased participation in Homebased Micro processing workshops. (initial)

Indicator: 

• Number of farms or food businesses who retained or expanded market opportunities and/or sales including locally produced foods. 

• Number of individuals who?attended certificate-based training?on food safety, food preservation, food processing, liability, and/or marketing. (This includes: PBPT, Produce Safety Alliance Training, Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) training, Value Chain Coordination Services Training, Farmers Market Sampling, Home-based Micro processing….). 

Method: HBM Post-Workshop Evaluation

Timeline: Annual (calendar year)

Outcome: Increase the number of partnerships and/or coalitions involved in promoting awareness of local food systems, health eating, and active living (e.g. Program councils, Health Advisory Boards, etc.). (initial)

Indicator: 

• Number of policy, systems, and/or environmental changes implemented within communities and organizations to promote active living, and healthy eating, including local food production and/or hunting/foraging and consumption (e.g. local food pantry can accept fresh foods or local game; starting/revitalizing a school or community garden; starting a walking club, etc.). 

• Number of individuals who were introduced to health food access points (e.g. farmers markets, CSAs, WIC, food pantries) through Extension programs or resources.

Method: Food Systems Impact Survey, planeatmove.com website data, NEP resources distributed;

Timeline: Annual, fiscal year (Food Systems Impact Survey);

Outcome: Short-term

Indicator:

• Number of participants who reported an increased knowledge of the dairy industry.  

• Number of participants who reported an increased knowledge of dairy management practices  

Method: Program evaluation survey 

Timeline: Immediate Post Program 

Outcome: Medium-term

Indicator: Number of participants who demonstrated/reported applying dairy management skills learned from UK Extension to their farm operations 

Method: Program evaluation survey or records from post farm visits and individual consultations 

Timeline: Throughout the Program Year 

Outcome: Long-term

Indicator: 

• Number of participants who reported a financial gain through using the skills learned in their dairy business. 

• Profit increase (dollars) reported by dairy businesses. 

• Number of participants who reported an improvement in their quality of life because of implementing the dairymanagement skills/practices learned from UK Extension 

Method: Program evaluation survey or records from post farm visits and individual consultations  

Timeline: End of program year or several years 

Outcome: Increased knowledge and awareness of raising pigs 

Indicator: 

• Number of participants who reported increased knowledge of management practices related to raising pigs. 

• Number of participants who reported that they intend to use the knowledge/skills gained from UK Extension to improve their swine management practices. 

Method: Program evaluation survey 

Timeline:  Annually

Outcome: Increased knowledge and/or awareness of management practices to improve sheep production efficiency 

Indicator: Number of participants who reported an increase in knowledge and/or awareness of best practices for managing/raising small ruminants. 

Method: Survey  

Timeline: Immediately after program participation. 

Outcome: Implementation or utilization of knowledge gained to make changes in management of small ruminant operation. 

Indicator: Number of participants that have made changes to improve management of their small ruminant operation. 

Method: Survey (post program) 

Timeline: Follow-up survey or records from individual consultations 

Outcome: Individuals gain financial management skills for small ruminant operations 

Indicator: Number of individuals that participated in small ruminant financial management programs. 

Method: Survey or records from individual consultations 

Timeline:   Annually

Outcome: Increased understanding of fiber production from sheep 

Indicator: Number of individuals that increased their knowledge of effective fiber production practices through participation in sheep shearing programs. 

Method: Survey  

Timeline:  Annually

Outcome: Gained knowledge and/or participated in direct marketing of lamb. 

Indicator: 

• Number of individuals that increased their knowledge of direct marketing of small ruminants. 

• Number of individuals who reported selling lamb directly to consumer/retailer. 

Method: Survey or records from individual consultations 

Timeline:  Annually

Outcome: Increased awareness of beef cattle quality assurance and care practices 

Indicator: Number of participants who obtained BQCA certifications 

Method: Post-program test 

Timeline: After program participation or online 

Outcome: Increased knowledge and/or awareness of management practices to improve cattle production efficiency 

Indicator: Number of participants who reported an increase in their knowledge and/or awareness of management practices for improving cattle production efficiency. 

Method: Survey  

Timeline: At the program 

Outcome: Implementation or utilization of knowledge gained to make changes in management of beef operation. 

Indicator: Number of participants who reported making a change to improve their beef cattle management practices. 

Method: Survey (post program) or records from individual consultations 

Timeline: 6-12 months after program 

Outcome: Increased Horse Management Knowledge 

Indicator: 

• Number of horse owners using Body Condition scoring to manage their horses. 

• Number of horse owners changing practices to reduce feed waste. 

• Number of horse owners using hay selection and use based on forage testing evaluation 

Method: Evaluation results and/or records from individual consultations 

Timeline: ongoing 

Outcome: Increased understanding of the horse industry  

Indicator: 

• Number of agent-led horse programing to their county programs. 

• Number of agents supporting Pastures Please and Farm and Facility Expo in their area. 

Method: Evaluation results and/or records from individual consultations 

Timeline: ongoing 

Outcome: Understanding of equine farm and facility sustainable management  

Indicator: 

• Number of participants implementing mud management practices. 

• Number of participants using temporary fences for grazing systems for horses. 

Method: Evaluation results and records from individual consultations  

Timeline: Ongoing

Outcome: Increased livestock marketing knowledge 

Indicator: 

• Number of participants who report increasing their knowledge of livestock marketing. 

• Number of individuals who implemented small ruminant financial management programs.

Method: Program evaluation tools/ surveys 

Timeline: Ongoing 

Outcome: Increased livestock management knowledge 

Indicator: Number of livestock producers indicating increased understanding of farm management. 

Method: Program evaluation tools / surveys 

Timeline: Ongoing 

Outcome: Increased awareness of and use of safe/effective pesticide application methods 

Indicator: 

• Number of certified applicators earning continuing education credit. 

• Number of participants reporting an increase in knowledge on integrated pest management techniques.  

• Number of participants reporting an increase in their use of risk mitigation strategies for pesticide application.  

Method: Surveys at CEU events 

Timeline:   Annually 

Outcome: Increased understanding of veterinary arthropod pest identification  

Indicator: 

• Number of participants that report knowledge gain in identification skills of arthropods. 

• Number of attendees that report behavior changes in pest monitoring. 

Method: In person survey  

Timeline: Immediately following Extension event  

Outcome: Increased knowledge and awareness of management practices to improve poultry production efficiency and food safety 

Indicator: 

• Number of participants indicating an increase in knowledge and/or awareness of poultry production 

• Number of participants who demonstrated/reported improved eggs and/or poultry cooking skills.

• Number of participants who increased their knowledge of the equipment and methods used in meat processing.

• Number of participants who reported an increase in knowledge of animal harvesting and carcass fabrication skills.

• Number of participants who reported an increased knowledge of egg and/or poultry food safety practices.

• Number of participants indicating an increase in knowledge and/or awareness of poultry production.

• Number of participants reporting an increase in knowledge on integrated pest management techniques.

Method: Survey

Timeline: At the program

Outcome: Improved production practices

Indicator: 

• Number of commercial participants who reported improving their plant production or management practices.

• Number of consumer participants who reported improving their plant production or management practices.

Method: Program evaluation tool/survey or records from individual consultations.

Timeline: After program participation.

Outcome: Stakeholders have knowledge and tools needed to better protect crops from diseases and understand the benefits of adopting best disease management practices and resistance mitigation. Stakeholders are more aware of UK plant pathology research

Indicator: Number of stakeholders who reported increased knowledge of research-based disease identification and management practices for crops grown in Kentucky and/or share that information with other stakeholders.

Method: Primarily surveys, records from consultations

Timeline: Annual

Outcome: Early identification of potential disease outbreaks

Indicator: 

• Number of stakeholders contacting Extension for help with disease identification and management.

• Number of plant samples submitted to the PDDL.

Method: Sample diagnosis through the PDDL, direct communication with Extension Specialists

Timeline: Annual

 

Outcome: Improved production practices and economic return of production inputs

Indicator: Number of participants who report increased economic return from improved production practices recommended in Plant Production and Management-related Extension programs.

Method: Surveys, participant feedback, CES agent feedback

Timeline: Frequently to annual

Outcome: Improved production practices

Indicator: Number of producers who reported increased knowledge of crop and forage production, fertility management, varieties, pest control, and/or sustainable practices.

Method: Surveys

Timeline: Annual

Outcome: Improved tobacco production practices, efficiency, and profitability

Indicator: Number of tobacco producers reporting increased economic returns, efficiency, or profitability after attending tobacco production meetings where improved production practices are presented at annual research update meetings.

Method: Surveys, views of research data published on Dark and Burley Tobacco Web pages, views of Dark Tobacco in Kentucky and Tennessee Facebook page, ANR agent feedback

Timeline: annual

Outcome: Identification of diseases and abiotic problems in crops and forages

Indicator: Number of plant diagnoses made annually with diagnosis and recommendation reports sent to ANR agent and grower.

Method: ANR agent feedback, grower feedback

Timeline: Annual

Outcome: Improved tobacco production practices, efficiency, and crop traceability

Indicator: 

• Number of tobacco producers participating in annual GAP Training.

• Number of tobacco producers reporting higher scores on annual third-party GAP Certification audits.

Method: GAP Training survey, Third-party GAP audit administered by GAP Connections, Views of research data published on Dark and Burley Tobacco Web pages, views of Dark Tobacco in Kentucky and Tennessee Facebook page

Timeline: annual

Outcome: Improved adoption of best management practices

Indicator: Number of turfgrass managers who reported that they gained knowledge of improved turfgrass management.

Method: Survey

Timeline: annual

Outcome: Improved adoption of best management practices and compliance with state regulations

Indicator: Number new applicator licenses awarded

Method: Survey and results from the KDA

Timeline: annual

Outcome: Improved knowledge base about the potential for hemp in KY

Indicator: Number of farms adopting/continuing hemp production.  

Method: Survey of program participants

Timeline: Annual and on-going

Outcome: Improving forage and livestock management

Indicator: Number of participants that indicate high likelihood of implementation of improved forage and livestock management practices.

Method: Schools, workshops, conferences, and field days.  Information from these events will also be pushed out through KY Forages YouTube Channel and Master Grazer Facebook page.

Timeline: Programs are provided one or more times annually at multiple locations throughout Kentucky

Outcome: Stakeholders have knowledge and tools needed to better protect crops from weeds and understand the benefits of adopting best management practices for weed and resistance mitigation. Stakeholders are more aware of UK weed science research

Indicator: Number of stakeholders who reported increased knowledge of research-based weed identification and/or weed management practices for crops grown in Kentucky.

Method: Primarily surveys, consultations

Timeline: Annual

Outcome: Increased crop management knowledge and skills?

Indicator: 

• Number of participants who increased their knowledge of risk management tools. 

• Number of participants who increased their use of risk management tools. 

• Number of participants who reported increased knowledge of plant production and/or management practices.

• Number of participants who reported reducing their inputs or costs in their plant production

• Number of participants who reported increased efficiency in their plant production and/or management

Method: Attendance and program evaluations / surveys

Timeline: Ongoing

Outcome:   Increase of community participation and awareness of environmental practices 

Indicator: 

• Number of home or community gardeners who reported that they implemented environmental stewardship (pollinator gardens, rain catchment, etc.)

• Number of non-commercial growers who reported adoption of improved management practices (soil sampling, reduced pesticide applications, integrated pest management, etc.)

• Number of community members using or participating in public or community gardens

• Amount of produce donated from community gardens

Method: survey

Timeline:   on going 

Outcome:   Awareness and implemented BMP into their farm or garden practices 

Indicator: 

• Number of commercial growers who reported improved specialty crop production and/or management practices.

• Number of non-commercial home gardeners who reported improved planting and/or management practices.

Method: survey    

Timeline:    on going 

Outcome:   Offer volunteer programs  

Indicator:  Increase horticulture volunteers

• Number of Master Gardener volunteers who completed training

• Number of Master Gardener volunteer service hours

• Number of clients engaged by Master Gardeners

• Number of programs led by Master Gardeners

Method: Offer  MG training program, invite individuals to become garden volunteer

Timeline:   on going  

Outcome: Increased awareness of wildlife, forestry, and natural resources issues 

Indicator: 

• Number of participants who reported that they gained knowledge of wildlife. 

• Number of participants who reported they gained their awareness of forestry. 

• Number of participants who reported they gained their awareness of natural resources.   

Method: Survey (Self-Assessment of Learning Gains) 

Timeline: At program 

Outcome: Increased management to address resources concerns 

Indicator: 

• Number of participants who reported that they developed new management plans. 

• Number of participants who reported an increase in the acres managed. 

• Number of participants (or state agencies) who reported that they implemented wildlife damage management practices  

Method: Follow-up Survey (Survey previous participants) and tracking number of management plans implemented by state agencies 

Timeline: Annually 

Outcome: Increased understanding of invasive arthropod identification 

Indicator: 

• Number of learners that report knowledge gain in identification skills 

• Number of attendees that report knowledge gain in differentiating native and non-native arthropods (and close relatives) 

Method: In person survey  

Timeline: Immediately following Extension event 

Outcome: Greater understanding of reporting invasive species to appropriate agencies 

Indicator: 

• Number of people self-reporting knowledge gain on how to properly report a sighting of an invasive insect, arachnid, or mollusk 

• Number of people reporting behavioral changes in reporting and in support of invasive species monitoring methods 

Method: In person survey and year later survey 

Timeline: In person surveys at Extension event and digital surveys distributed one year later 

Outcome: Increased awareness of and use of safe/effective pesticide application methods 

Indicator: 

• Number of certified applicators attending continuing education credit Extension events (both private and commercial) 

• Number of people self-reporting knowledge gain on integrated pest management techniques  

• Number of people self-reporting behavioral changes regarding risk mitigation strategies for pesticide application 

Method: Surveys at CEU events 

Timeline:  on going 

Outcome: Increased awareness of and use of Food Connection Programs: Value Chain Coordinators, TFC Learning Kitchen, and Cultivate KY resources. (initial)

Indicator: 

• Number of farms or food businesses who retained or expanded market opportunities and/or sales including locally produced foods. 

• Number of individuals who? attended certificate-based training on food safety, food preservation, food processing, liability, and/or marketing. (This includes: PBPT, Produce Safety Alliance Training, Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) training, Value Chain Coordination Services Training, Farmers Market Sampling, Home-based Microprocessing….). 

• Number of people who used Extension and/or Food Connection resources and/or services for pricing and/or marketing local foods (examples of services include: Kentucky Nutrition Education Program/KYNEP, PlateEatMove.com, Plate It Up Kentucky Proud!, Cook Wild Kentucky, Kentucky Value Chain Coordinators, Cultivate Kentucky Partnership, etc.). 

• Number of individuals reporting an increased awareness of how to find and prepare local food including responsible hunting/fishing/foraging. 

Method: Agent Tool level from The Food Connection (being developed); 

Timeline: Annual: Food System Impact Survey (federal fiscal year); The Food Connection (calendar year); HBMP (annual calendar year)

Outcome: Increased awareness and accessibility of Extension resources and programs supporting food access. (initial)

Indicator: 

• Number of individuals reporting an increased awareness of how to find and prepare local food including responsible hunting/fishing/foraging. 

• Number of policy, systems, and/or environmental changes implemented within communities and organizations to promote active living, and healthy eating, including local food production and/or hunting/foraging and consumption (e.g. local food pantry can accept fresh foods or local game; starting/revitalizing a school or community garden; starting a walking club, etc.). 

• Number of individuals who reported increasing their knowledge, skills, or intentions regarding nutrition and accessing healthy foods through Extension programs and resources. 

• Number of individuals who were introduced to healthy food access points (e.g. farmers’ markets, CSAs, WIC, food pantries) through Extension programs or resources.  

Method: Pre/post participant evaluations from: NEP agent-led curricula, Food Preservation, Champion Food Volunter Leader Training; the Learning Kitchen Participant follow-up eval. TBD; # of certified Champion Food Volunteers in each county;

Timeline: Post-program/curricula survey administration; annual fiscal year (food system impact survey)

Outcome: Improved skills related to safe food preparation and food preservation. (initial)

Indicator: 

• Number of individuals who reported increasing their knowledge, skills, or intentions regarding the safe storage, handling, preparation and/or preservation of food through Extension programs and resources.  

• Number of individuals who reported supplementing their diets with healthy foods that they grew, harvested, or preserved (e.g. community or backyard gardens, fishing, hunting). 

Method: Pre/post participant evaluations from: NEP agent-led curricula, Champion Food Volunteer, Food Preservation;

Timeline: Post-program/curricula survey administration; annual fiscal year (food system impact survey)

Outcome: Increased participation in Homebased Microprocessing workshops. (initial)

Indicator: 

• Number of farms or food businesses who retained or expanded market opportunities and/or sales including locally produced foods. 

• Number of individuals who attended certificate-based training on food safety, food preservation, food processing, liability, and/or marketing. (This includes: PBPT, Produce Safety Alliance Training, Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) training, Value Chain Coordination Services Training, Farmers Market Sampling, Home-based Microprocessing….). 

Method: HBM Post-Workshop Evaluation

Timeline: Annual (calendar year)

Outcome: Increase the number of partnerships and/or coalitions involved in promoting awareness of local food systems, health eating, and active living (e.g. Program councils, Health Advisory Boards, etc.). (initial)

Indicator: 

• Number of policy, systems, and/or environmental changes implemented within communities and organizations to promote active living, and healthy eating, including local food production and/or hunting/foraging and consumption (e.g. local food pantry can accept fresh foods or local game; starting/revitalizing a school or community garden; starting a walking club, etc.). 

• Number of individuals who were introduced to health food access points (e.g. farmers markets, CSAs, WIC, food pantries) through Extension programs or resources.

Method: Food Systems Impact Survey, planeatmove.com website data, NEP resources distributed.

Timeline: Annual, fiscal year (Food Systems Impact Survey);

Outcome: Short? 

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they have identified their interest in natural resources.

• Number of youth who reported that they understand how their actions and choices impact natural resources and the environment.??? 

• Number of youth who reported that they understand natural resources concepts and ideas. 

• Number of youth who reported that have set goals to become a good steward of natural resources.

Method: Survey 

Timeline: Administered immediately following program/activity 

Outcome: Medium

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that have applied the skills they learned in natural resources to other areas of their life, including at home, school and other programs.  

• Number of youth who reported that they have taken steps to conserve natural resources.  

• Number of youth who reported that they have used their skills and/or knowledge gained to complete a natural resources project.  

Method: Survey 

Timeline: Administered at end of program year/club year 

Outcome:  Long-Term 

Indicator: Long-term evaluation will be conducted using the National 4-H Index Study. 

Method: Survey 

Timeline:  Administered at end of program

Outcome: Youth Short Term Food Safety, Quality, and Access Outcomes

Indicator:

• Number of youth who reported that they learned the difference between healthy and unhealthy snacks. 

• Number of youth who reported that they learned about safe food handling and preparation.  

• Number of youth who reported that they learned about kitchen safety.  

• Number of youth who reported that they have identified an interest in Family Consumer Sciences. 

• Number of youth who reported an increased knowledge of egg and/or poultry food safety practices.

• Number of youth who demonstrated/reported improved egg and/or poultry cooking skills.

Method: Survey

Timeline: Immediate Post Program

Outcome: Youth Short Term Animal Production and Management Outcomes

Indicator:    • Number of youth who reported that they have realized the impact animal production has in daily life. 

• Number of youth who reported that they have an interest in animal production. 

• Number of youth who reported that they have identified at least one job/career in animal production and management that fits their interest.   

• Number of youth who reported that they understand animal production concepts and ideas.

• Number of adults in the county 4-H country ham program.

Method: Survey

Timeline: Immediate Post Program

Outcome: Youth Short Term Plant Production and Management Outcomes

Indicator    • Number of youth who reported increased understanding of the impact (or role) of plant production in their daily lives.

• Number of youth who reported an increased interest in plant production and management. 

• Number of youth who reported that they understand plant production concepts and ideas.

• Number of youth who reported that they have identified at least one job/career in plant production and management that fits their interest

Method: Survey

Timeline: Immediate Post Program

Outcome: Youth Short Term Sustainability, Natural Resources and Wildlife Management, and Environmental Outcomes

Indicator    • Number of youth who reported that they have identified their interest in natural resources.? 

• Number of youth who reported that they understand how their actions and choices impact natural resources and the environment.??? 

• Number of youth who reported that they understand natural resources concepts and ideas. 

• Number of youth who reported that have set goals to become a good steward of natural resources.? 

Method: Survey

Timeline: Immediate Post Program

Outcome: Youth Medium Term Food Safety, Quality, and Access Outcomes

Indicator    • Number of youth who reported that they applied skills and/or knowledge to prepare healthy snacks for self or family.  

• Number of youth who reported that they practiced safe food handling and preparation.  

• Number of youth who reported that they practiced kitchen safety. 

• Number of youth who reported that they have used the skills and/or knowledge gained to complete a Family Consumer Sciences Project. 

Method: Standard Evaluation Tool for Family Consumer Sciences: Survey

Timeline: End of the program year

Outcome: Youth Medium Term Animal Production and Management Outcomes

Indicator: • Number of youth who reported that they have used the knowledge and/or skills gained in agriculture to make informed decisions. 

• Number of youth who reported that they have taken steps to pursue gaining more knowledge for a job in animal production based on their interests.  

• Number of youth who reported that they used knowledge and/or skills gained in animal production to complete a project. 

• Number of youth who reported that they adopted/applied one or more animal production practices.  

Method: Survey

Timeline: End of the program year

Outcome: Youth Medium Term Plant Production and Management Outcomes

Indicator: • Number of youth who reported that they have used the knowledge and skills gained in plant production to make informed decisions. 

• Number of youth who reported that they have used the knowledge and/or skills gained in plant production to complete a project.

• Number of youth who reported that they have taken steps to pursue gaining more knowledge for a job in plant production based on their interests.

Method: Survey

Timeline: End of the program year

Outcome: Youth Medium Term Sustainability, Natural Resources and Wildlife Management, and Environmental Outcomes

Indicator: • Number of youth who reported that have applied the skills they learned in natural resources to other areas of their life, including at home, school and other programs.  

• Number of youth who reported that they have taken steps to conserve natural resources.  

• Number of youth who reported that they have used their skills and/or knowledge gained to complete a natural resources project. 

Method: Survey

Timeline: End of the program year

Outcome: Long Term

Indicator: Long-term evaluation will be conducted using the National 4-H Index Study.

Method: Standard Evaluation Tool for Family Consumer Sciences: Survey 

Timeline: 1+ years  

Learning Opportunities:

Audience: Individuals & Farmers

Project or Activity: Nutrition Education

Content or Curriculum: Nutrition Education Program, SNAP-Ed toolkit, Publications, Faithful Families, Cook Together Eat Together, Savor the Flavor, Dining with Diabetes, Plate it up! Kentucky Proud, Food as Health Toolkit, Family Mealtime, maternal and child health program materials, www.planeatmove.com, Super Star Chef, Farm to School, Hunger in Kentucky

Inputs: Programmatic materials, paid staff, community partners, volunteers, faith-based organizations, health coalitions, healthcare Providers and local clinics, health department, non-profits, schools, company health & wellness, 4-H, Homemakers, farmers’ markets, local farmers/growers/producers, commodity groups, community centers, etc. 

Dates: Ongoing

Audience: Individuals & Farmers

Project or Activity: Home Based Micro Processing

Content or Curriculum: HBMP Training materials

Inputs: Programmatic materials, paid staff, volunteers, community partners, facilities, health department, State of Kentucky, KDA, non-profits, schools, faith-based organizations, Homemakers, community centers, farmers, farmers’ markets, etc. 

Dates: Ongoing

Audience: Individuals & Farmers

Project or Activity: Value-Chain Coordinators & Cultivate KY at The Food Connection

Content or Curriculum: Value-Chain Coordinators; Cultivate KY Resources

Inputs: Programmatic materials, paid staff, volunteers, community partners, state agencies, farmers, students, etc. 

Dates: Ongoing

Audience: Individuals & Farmers

Project or Activity: Cook Wild

Content or Curriculum: Publications, trainings, recipes

Inputs: Programmatic materials, paid staff, volunteers, community partners, facilities, non-profits, 4-H, faith-based organizations, Homemakers, community centers, etc.

Dates: Ongoing

Audience: Communities

Project or Activity: School, Community or Recovery Gardens

Content or Curriculum: NEP “Grow your own” publications, Hort. Dept. publications, youth gardening curriculum, Recovery Garden Toolkit

Inputs: Gardening materials, paid staff, community partners, 4-H, volunteers, grant funds, local organizations and community partners, schools, recovery centers, Nutrition Education Program

Dates: Ongoing

Audience: Communities

Project or Activity: Farmers’ Market Toolkit

Content or Curriculum: Farmers’ Market Toolkit

Inputs: Programmatic materials, paid staff, volunteers, community partners, facilities, health department, non-profits, schools, faith-based organizations, Homemakers, community centers, farmers, farmers’ markets, etc.

Dates: Ongoing

Audience: Youth  

Project or Activity: Nutrition and Food Preparation

Content or Curriculum: Put It Up: Food Preservation

Inputs: 

• 4-H Family and Consumer Sciences programs in which youth experience a sense of belonging, and developmental relationships, explore their spark, and actively engage in meaningful opportunities.  

• Accredited and certified volunteers in 4-H FCS projects. 

• Kentucky Extension Homemakers Association  

• Four residential camping facilities.  

• Cooperative Extension Educational facilities.  

• Utilization of approved research-based curriculum. 

• Outreach of the Cooperative Extension Land-Grant System.  

• Funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc.  

• Funding from local, state, and federal sources.  

• Engagement of youth and volunteers in program delivery. 

• Engaging communities in identifying and implementing programming based on local needs 

Dates: September 1 – August 30 

Audience: : General Public & City/County Officials

Project or Activity: Invasive species/Non-native plant management and control

Content or Curriculum: Identification, use of management tools including herbicides

Inputs: Paid staff

Date(s): Throughout the year

Audience: : General Public & Youth

Project or Activity: River Sweep

Content or Curriculum: Litter collection along Licking River

Inputs: paid staff, volunteers, General James Taylor Park

Date(s): Late May / Early June 2026

Audience: General Public (Youth and Adults)

Project or Activity: Campbell County Trail Passport Project promotion, challenge events, and led hikes at parks

Content or Curriculum: Trail maps for 18 parks and greenspaces

Inputs: 12 cities in the county collaborated, Planning and Development Service for GIS support

Date(s): Throughout the year

Audience: General Public and City/County Officials

Project or Activity: Land Management Assistance including Wildlife habitat improvement/control, erosion control, natural lands preservation

Content or Curriculum: Natural Resource Conservation Service, Conservation easement information 

Inputs: paid staff, UK/other publications

Date: throughout the year

Audience: General Public and City/County Officials

Project or Activity: Arboriculture/Forestry Assistance to property owners 

Content or Curriculum: International Society of Arboriculture recommended practices, formal education

Inputs: paid staff

Date: throughout the year

Audience: General Public 

Project or Activity: Ornithology Assistance

Content or Curriculum: Identification of birds, bird biology and ecology

Inputs: paid staff

Date: throughout the year

Audience: Public Workers, Tree Board Members, Certified Arborists, General Public 

Project or Activity: Tree Seminar for N KY Municipal Employees, Tree Boards and general public 

Content or Curriculum: Proper tree selection, planting and management, ISA recommended practices (ISA CEUs available) 

Inputs: paid staff, volunteers

Date: Early March 2026

Audience: General Public 

Project or Activity: Wildlife Habitat Improvement/Management Assistance

Content or Curriculum: Best management practices to attract wildlife

Inputs: paid staff

Date: throughout the year

Audience: General Public

Project or Activity: NKY Household Hazardous Waste Collection Event

Content or Curriculum: Collection and Disposal of electronics and household hazardous waste through vendors paid by a state grant

Inputs: Division of Waste Management grant, NKY Household Hazardous Waste Action Coalition, Disposal Vendors

Date: November 1,2026

Audience: General Public

Project or Activity: Composting Education and Bin Distribution Events

Content or Curriculum: Orbis Earth Machine User Guide and U.K. Home Composting Publications

Inputs: Compost bins from Orbis, Funding from District Board, paid staff

Date: Fall 2025 / Winter 2026

Audience: General Public

Project or Activity: Stormwater Conservation and Rain Barrel Distribution Events

Content or Curriculum: Orbis Systern User Guide and Extension Publications

Inputs: Rain barrels from Orbis, Funding from District Board, paid staff

Dates: Summer 2025 / Spring 2026

Audience: General Public

Project or Activity: waste management assistance 

Content or Curriculum: appropriate management of solid waste including reduce, reuse, recycle 

Inputs: local solid waste coordinator, waste haulers, landfills, recycling centers and services

Date: throughout the year

Audience: Cities, schools, churches, neighborhood associations, etc. and volunteers 

Project or Activity: Environmental Stewardship Project Funding 

Content or Curriculum: Project funding/application/project assistance for community gardens, outdoor classrooms, educational plantings for non-profits 

Inputs: paid staff, volunteers, district board grant funding

Date: Grant deadline and funding late summer 2025. Projects must be completed by mid-June 2026

Audience: Teachers & Educators 

Project or Activity: Lesson planning w/teachers 

Content or Curriculum: various environmental education curriculum 

Inputs: paid staff 

Date: throughout the year 

Audience: Students, Teachers 

Project or Activity: outdoor classroom and raised bed gardening programs 

Content or Curriculum: environmental studies (plants, animals, ecosystems) 

Inputs: paid staff 

Date: September, October, November 2025, March, April, May 2026

Audience: Students, Teachers 

Project or Activity: Consumer Actions and Decisions Influence the Environment 

Content or Curriculum: various solid waste topics (recycling and sustainability topics, littering, etc.)  ABC (A Bench for Caps) Program – Green Tree Plastics 

Inputs: paid staff 

Date: Throughout the year

Audience: Students, Teachers 

Project or Activity: Why Feed Birds? - Birdfeeder Workshop 

Content or Curriculum: Bird ecology/constructing feeders for school grounds, interdependent relationships in ecosystems 

Inputs: paid staff 

Date: Jan - April 2026

Audience: Students, Teachers 

Project or Activity: Arbor Day and Earth Day programs 

Content or Curriculum: tree and wildflower planting to engage students in the improvement of the environment 

Inputs: paid staff 

Date: April 2026

Audience: general public and youth 

Project or Activity: Jolly Thursdays and Tower Tuesdays with Campbell County Public Library and Parks and Recreation Department of the County and City of Fort Thomas

Content or Curriculum: Science and Arts 

Inputs: paid staff 

Date: Thursdays on June-July 2025 - 2026

Audience: general public 

Project or Activity: Aquatic Ecology @ EEC

Content or Curriculum: Hands-on workshop, ecological education, environmental awareness 

Inputs: paid staff 

Date: July 2025, May, June 2026

Audience: general public 

Project or Activity: Wilderness Walks @ EEC

Content or Curriculum: Flower ID, environmental awareness and education 

Inputs: paid staff 

Date: July, September, November 2025, March, May 2026

Audience: general public  

Project or Activity: Night Hikes @ EEC

Content or Curriculum: Nocturnal Education, environmental awareness and education 

Inputs: paid staff 

Date: December 2025, February, March 2026 

Audience: general public 

Project or Activity: Afternoon of Birding @ EEC

Content or Curriculum: Bird ID, ecological education, environmental awareness 

Inputs: paid staff 

Date: July, September, December 2025, March 2026

Audience: general public 

Project or Activity: Snakes @ EEC

Content or Curriculum: Hands-on workshop, wildlife education, environmental awareness 

Inputs: paid staff 

Date: June 2026

Audience: general public 

Project or Activity: Campbell County Animals @ EEC

Content or Curriculum: Hands-on workshop, ecological education, environmental awareness 

Inputs: paid staff 

Date: January, February 2026

Audience: general public 

Project or Activity: Nature Crafts @ EEC

Content or Curriculum: Hands-on workshop, ecological education, environmental awareness 

Inputs: paid staff 

Date: April 2026

Audience: general public 

Project or Activity: Wreath Making @ EEC

Content or Curriculum: Hands-on workshop, ecological education, environmental awareness 

Inputs: paid staff 

Date: December 2025, February 2026

Audience: general public 

Project or Activity: Animal Habitat  @ EEC

Content or Curriculum: Wildlife awareness and education 

Inputs: paid staff 

Date: March 2026

Audience: general public 

Project or Activity: Animal Tracking @ EEC

Content or Curriculum: Hands-on workshop, ecological education, environmental awareness  

Inputs: paid staff 

Date: October 2025, January, March 2026

 Audience: 4-H members, various scouts 

Project or Activity: 4-H Clubs and Scouts Environmental volunteer projects  @ EEC

Content or Curriculum: Wildflower, Trees, and Grassland planting, as well as non-native control, to improve the environment  

Inputs: paid staff and volunteers 

Date: throughout the year

 Audience: general public 

Project or Activity: Build a Birdhouse @ EEC

Content or Curriculum: Hands-on workshop, ecological education, environmental awareness 

Inputs: paid staff 

Date: December 2025, February, March 2026

 

Audience: general public 

Project or Activity: Build a Bat house  @ EEC

Content or Curriculum: Hands-on workshop, ecological education, environmental awareness  

Inputs: paid staff 

Date: April 2026

 Audience: public and private elementary students 

Project or Activity: Fall Environmental Day Camp @ EEC

Content or Curriculum: Reptiles and amphibians, solar energy, raptors, botany 

Inputs: paid staff, KY Reptile Zoo employees 

Date: September - October 2025

 Audience: public and private elementary, middle and high school students 

Project or Activity: Spring Field Trips @ EEC

Content or Curriculum: Kentucky's Plants and Animals, Ecosystems and Ecology 

Inputs: paid staff 

Date: March - May 2026

 Audience: general public 

Project or Activity: Oyster and Shiitake Mushroom Production Workshop 

Content or Curriculum: growing, harvesting, marketing and cooking 

Inputs: paid staff 

Date: March 2026

Audience: NKU students enrolled in Environmental Careers Course 

Project or Activity: Tour and overview of jobs in Extension  @ EEC

Content or Curriculum: Environmental Education Center and UK Extension Resources  

Inputs: paid staff, NKU professor 

Date: August/September 2025

 Audience: general public 

Project or Activity: Environmental/Land Management Assistance 

Content or Curriculum: wildlife management, forestry, etc. 

Inputs: paid staff 

Date: throughout the year 2023-2024

Audience: Pesticide Applicators (Farmers, City / Public Workers / Arborists / Lawn and Landscape Care)

Activity: Pesticide Safety Certification

Content or Curriculum: Private Applicators Pesticide Training

Inputs: Kentucky Department of Ag, Extension publications & DVD, agent

Date: February 2024 and as requested 

Audience: : General Public & Youth

Project or Activity: Reforest Campbell County

Content or Curriculum: Tree planting and tree seedling giveaway to engage the public and improve the environment

Inputs: paid staff, volunteers, planting site on public property (to be determined)

Date(s): April 2026

Audience: : Youth

Project or Activity: Nutrition and Food Preparation 

Content or Curriculum: 4-H Cooking: 101, 201, 301, 401, Teen Cuisine, Culinary Challenge, Put It Up: Food Preservation, International Foods, Passport Kitchen, Global Table, Exploring My Plate, Literacy, Eating, and Activity for Primary Youth (LEAP), What’s on Your Plate

Inputs: • 4-H Family and Consumer Sciences programs in which youth experience a sense of belonging, and developmental relationships, explore their spark, and actively engage in meaningful opportunities.  

• Accredited and certified volunteers in 4-H FCS projects. 

• Kentucky Extension Homemakers Association  

• Four residential camping facilities.  

• Cooperative Extension Educational facilities.  

• Utilization of approved research-based curriculum. 

• Outreach of the Cooperative Extension Land-Grant System.  

• Funding from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc.  

• Funding from local, state, and federal sources.  

• Engagement of youth and volunteers in program delivery. 

• Engaging communities in identifying and implementing programming based on local needs

Date(s): 4- H Program Year

Audience: : Youth

Project or Activity: Kentucky 4-H Dog Program

Content or Curriculum: Kentucky Dog Volunteer Certification Curriculum, Ohio State University (OSU) Dog Resource Handbook, Ohio State University (OSU) Dog Project and Record Book, Ohio State University (OSU) Dog Learning Lab Kit, National 4-H Dog Curriculum Levels 1-3 and Helper’s Guide, American Kennel Club Website, Kentucky 4-H Dog Program Rule Book, Kentucky 4-H Dog Program Overview 

Inputs: • 4-H programs in agriculture in which youth experience a sense of belonging, developmental relationships, explore their spark, and are actively engaged in opportunities that are meaningful.?? 

• Certified volunteers in animal sciences (livestock, horse, poultry, rabbit, and dog).? 

• Accredited volunteers in agriculture.? 

• Research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system.? 

• Funding opportunities from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc.? 

• Funding from local, state, and federal sources, and grants.? 

• Engagement of volunteers and youth in delivering the programs and leading clubs.? 

• Engagement of communities in identifying and implementing programming based on meeting local needs.?? 

• External stakeholder engagement and support such as commodity groups and agriculturalist organizations.??? 

Date(s): 4- H Program Year

Audience: : Youth

Project or Activity: Equine

Content or Curriculum: Ohio State University (OSU) Horse Learning Lab Kit, Kentucky Horse Volunteer Certification Curriculum, Horse Reference Manual (Alberta 4-H), 4-H Horse Academy, Kentucky 4-H Horse Website

Inputs: • 4-H programs in agriculture in which youth experience a sense of belonging, developmental relationships, explore their spark, and are actively engaged in opportunities that are meaningful.??e.g. 4-H Horse Camp and horse shows. 

• Certified volunteers in animal sciences (livestock, horse, poultry, rabbit, and dog).? 

• Accredited volunteers in agriculture.? 

• Research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system.? 

• Funding opportunities from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc.? 

• Funding from local, state, and federal sources, and grants.? 

• Engagement of volunteers and youth in delivering the programs and leading clubs.? 

• Engagement of communities in identifying and implementing programming based on meeting local needs.?? 

• External stakeholder engagement and support such as commodity groups and agriculturalist organizations.?

Date(s): 4- H Program Year

Audience: : Youth

Project or Activity: Kentucky 4-H Livestock Program

Content or Curriculum: Kentucky Animal Science Livestock Discovery Website, Kentucky Livestock Volunteer Certification Curriculum, Ohio State University (OSU) Livestock Resource Handbook, Ohio State University (OSU) Livestock Project and Record Book, Ohio State University (OSU) Learning Lab Kits, National 4-H Project Books and Helper’s Guide, Kentucky 4-H Livestock Program Overview, Kentucky 4-H Livestock Rules and Guidelines 

Inputs: • 4-H programs in agriculture in which youth experience a sense of belonging, developmental relationships, explore their spark, and are actively engaged in opportunities that are meaningful.?? e.g. fairs and shows.

• Certified volunteers in animal sciences (livestock, horse, poultry, rabbit, and dog).? 

• Accredited volunteers in agriculture.? 

• Research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system.? 

• Funding opportunities from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc.? 

• Funding from local, state, and federal sources, and grants.? 

• Engagement of volunteers and youth in delivering the programs and leading clubs.? 

• Engagement of communities in identifying and implementing programming based on meeting local needs.?? 

• External stakeholder engagement and support such as commodity groups and agriculturalist organizations.?? 

Date(s): 4- H Program Year

Audience: Youth

Project or Activity: Kentucky 4-H Poultry Program

Content or Curriculum: Pullet Project Guide (university of Kentucky), National 4-H Poultry Judging Manual published by Nebraska Cooperative Extension Service, Evaluating Egg Laying Hens (University of Kentucky), Standards for Scoring Placing Classes (University of Kentucky), Kentucky 4-H Poultry: Giving Oral Reasons (University of Kentucky), Notesheet for Poultry Reasons (University of Kentucky), Criteria for Evaluating Oral Reasons (University of Kentucky), Kentucky 4-H Poultry: Grading RTC Poultry (University of Kentucky), Kentucky 4-H Poultry: Grading Eggs (University of Kentucky), Examples of Different Grades of Broken Out Eggs (University of Kentucky); OSU Chick Quest – A Classroom Journey Through the Life Cycle of Chickens

Inputs: • 4-H programs in agriculture in which youth experience a sense of belonging, developmental relationships, explore their spark, and are actively engaged in opportunities that are meaningful.?? 

• Certified volunteers in animal sciences (livestock, horse, poultry, rabbit, and dog).? 

• Accredited volunteers in agriculture.? 

• Research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system.? 

• Funding opportunities from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc.? 

• Funding from local, state, and federal sources, and grants.? 

• Engagement of volunteers and youth in delivering the programs and leading clubs.? 

• Engagement of communities in identifying and implementing programming based on meeting local needs.?? 

• External stakeholder engagement and support such as commodity groups and agriculturalist organizations.?? 

• Classroom Chick Incubation 

Date(s): 4- H Program Year

Audience: : Youth

Project or Activity: Kentucky 4-H Rabbit Program 

Content or Curriculum: Ohio State University (OSU) Rabbit Resource Handbook, Ohio State University (OSU) Rabbit Project Record Book, Ohio State University (OSU) Rabbit Learning Lab Kit, National 4-H Rabbit Curriculum Levels 1-3 and Helper’s Guide, American Rabbit Breeders Association (ARBA) Standard of Perfection, Kentucky 4-H Rabbit Program Guide and Rule Book, 4-H Rabbit Program Overview 

Inputs: • 4-H programs in agriculture in which youth experience a sense of belonging, developmental relationships, explore their spark, and are actively engaged in opportunities that are meaningful.?? 

• Certified volunteers in animal sciences (livestock, horse, poultry, rabbit, and dog).? 

• Accredited volunteers in agriculture.? 

• Research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system.? 

• Funding opportunities from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc.? 

• Funding from local, state, and federal sources, and grants.? 

• Engagement of volunteers and youth in delivering the programs and leading clubs.? 

• Engagement of communities in identifying and implementing programming based on meeting local needs.?? 

• External stakeholder engagement and support such as commodity groups and agriculturalist organizations.?? 

Date(s): 4- H Program Year

Audience: : Youth

Project or Activity: Kentucky 4-H Country Ham Program 

Content or Curriculum: Kentucky Animal Science Livestock Discovery Website, Kentucky Livestock Volunteer Certification Curriculum, Ohio State University (OSU) Livestock Resource Handbook, Ohio State University (OSU) Livestock Project and Record Book, Ohio State University (OSU) Learning Lab Kits, National 4-H Project Books and Helper’s Guide, Country Ham Meat Lesson Kit (University of Kentucky)

Inputs: • 4-H programs in agriculture in which youth experience a sense of belonging, developmental relationships, explore their spark, and are actively engaged in opportunities that are meaningful.?? 

• Certified volunteers in animal sciences (livestock, horse, poultry, rabbit, and dog).? 

• Accredited volunteers in agriculture.? 

• Research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system.? 

• Funding opportunities from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc.? 

• Funding from local, state, and federal sources, and grants.? 

• Engagement of volunteers and youth in delivering the programs and leading clubs.? 

• Engagement of communities in identifying and implementing programming based on meeting local needs.?? 

• External stakeholder engagement and support such as commodity groups and agriculturalist organizations.?? 

Date(s): 4- H Program Year

Audience: : Youth

Project or Activity: General Agricultural Short Term Programs (School Enrichment, 4-H Camp, etc.) 

Content or Curriculum: • Any 4-H Curriculum 

• Kentucky Ag and Environment in the Classroom, Inc. (KyAEC) https://www.teachkyag.org/ 

• Kentucky Food and Farm Facts https://www.kyfoodandfarm.info/  

• Kids Sonder: Agriculture Unboxed https://www.mommassonder.com/  

• National Ag Day https://www.agday.org/  

• National Ag and Environment in the Classroom https://agclassroom.org/ 

Inputs: • 4-H programs in agriculture in which youth experience a sense of belonging, developmental relationships, explore their spark, and are actively engaged in opportunities that are meaningful.??e.g. Grow It, Eat It, Wear It. 

• Certified volunteers in animal sciences (livestock, horse, poultry, rabbit, and dog).? 

• Accredited volunteers in agriculture.? 

• Research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system.? 

• Funding opportunities from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc.? 

• Funding from local, state, and federal sources, and grants.? 

• Engagement of volunteers and youth in delivering the programs and leading clubs.? 

• Engagement of communities in identifying and implementing programming based on meeting local needs.?? 

• External stakeholder engagement and support such as commodity groups and agriculturalist organizations.?? 

Date(s): 4- H Program Year

Audience: : Youth

Project or Activity: 4-H Plant and Soil Science Projects?(e.g., fair displays and exhibit entries)

Content or Curriculum: • National and State-Level Research-Based, Vetted Publications, Curricula, and Educational Resources (e.g., Junior Master Gardener, National 4-H Gardening Series, 4-H State Fair Exhibit Factsheets, Extension Publications)?

Inputs: • 4-H programs in agriculture in which youth experience a sense of belonging, developmental relationships, explore their spark, and are actively engaged in opportunities that are meaningful.???

• Accredited volunteers in agriculture.??

• Research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system.??

• Funding opportunities from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc.??

• Funding from local, state, and federal sources, and grants.??

• Engagement of volunteers and youth in delivering the programs and leading clubs.??

• Engagement of communities in identifying and implementing programming based on meeting local needs.???

• External stakeholder engagement and support such as commodity groups and agriculturalist organizations.

Date(s): 4- H Program Year

Audience: : Youth

Project or Activity: 4-H Natural Resources Projects?(e.g., insect collections, leaf collections, leaf print collections, wood science projects, rock, mineral, and/or fossil collections)

Content or Curriculum: Entomology, Forestry, Wood Science, Geology; Curriculum - National and State-Level Research-Based, Vetted Publications, Curricula, and Educational Resources? 

Inputs: • 4-H programs in natural resources in which youth experience a sense of belonging, developmental relationships, explore their spark, and are actively engaged in opportunities that are meaningful to them.??? 

• Accredited volunteers in natural resources.??? 

• Research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system.??? 

• Funding opportunities from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc.??? 

• Funding from local, state, and federal sources, and grants.?

• Engagement of staff, volunteers, and youth in delivering the program

Date(s): 4- H Program Year

Audience: : Youth

Project or Activity: 4-H Shooting Sports Program

Content or Curriculum: National 4-H Shooting Sports Training Curriculum?

Inputs: • 4-H programs in natural resources in which youth experience a sense of belonging, developmental relationships, explore their spark, and are actively engaged in opportunities that are meaningful to them.??? 

• Accredited volunteers in natural resources.??? 

• Research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system.??? 

• Funding opportunities from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc.??? 

• Funding from local, state, and federal sources, and grants.?

• Engagement of staff, volunteers, and youth in delivering the program

Date(s): 4- H Program Year

Audience: Adults 

Project or Activity: IPM and Pesticide Programs 

Content or Curriculum: Educational materials and program delivery 

Inputs: UK and subject matter Specialists, Agents

Dates: Frequently throughout the year

Audience: General public 

Project or Activity: Pest and disease identification 

Content or Curriculum: Clinical diagnoses and trainings  

Inputs: Diagnostic labs and services 

Dates: Frequently throughout the year

Audience: Adults

Project or Activity: Grain Crops Management, including Corn, Soybean, Wheat, Barley, Rye, Canola and others

Content or Curriculum: Publications, Fact Sheets, Workshops, Field Days, County Meetings, Regional Meetings, Field Visits, emails and phone calls

Inputs: UK and subject matter Specialists, Agents

Date: Annual updates

Audience: Pesticide applicators

Project or Activity: PSEP certification for private applicators and continuing education for commercial applicators

Content or Curriculum: Educational materials and program delivery

Inputs: UK and subject matter Specialists, Agents

Date: Annual updates

Audience: Agricultural producers

Project or Activity: IPM Programs

Content or Curriculum: Educational materials and program delivery

Inputs: EIP Grant, UK Specialists, commodity grants

Date: all year long

Audience: Agricultural producers and the public

Project or Activity: Pest and disease identification

Content or Curriculum: Clinical diagnoses and trainings

Inputs: Diagnostic labs and services

Date: all year long

Audience: Specialty crop growers

Project or Activity: Programming for specialty crop production and management

Content or Curriculum: Publications, Fact Sheets, Workshops, Field Days, County Meetings, Regional Meetings, Field Visits, emails and phone calls

Inputs: Extension Specialists, Kentucky Horticulture Council, USDA funding, Dept of Labor funding, county agents, KDA, professional member organizations

Date: Annual updates

Audience: Homeowners and consumers

Project or Activity: Programming for home gardening and landscape management

Content or Curriculum: Publications, Fact Sheets, Workshops, County Meetings, Regional Meetings, emails and phone calls

Inputs: Extension Specialists, USDA funding, county agents, KDA, Kentucky Extension Master Gardener Program

Date: Annual

Audience: Agricultural stakeholders (farmers, certified crop advisors, industry, others)

Project or Activity: Identification and management of diseases that affect grain, forage crops and tobacco. Grain crops include corn, sorghum, soybean, small grains, canola.  

Content or Curriculum: Publications, Live and virtual trainings, online videos, workshops, field days, county meetings, regional and national meetings, field visits, emails and phone calls

Inputs: UK Plant Pathology Extension Specialists, research and extension funding

Date: Annual

Audience: Agricultural stakeholders (producers, industry, others)

Project or Activity: Disease identification and management of horticulture and specialty crops. Crops include tree and berry fruits, hemp, field and high tunnel vegetables, greenhouse floriculture, landscapes and urban forests, and home horticulture

Content or Curriculum: Publications, Live and virtual trainings, online videos, workshops, field days, county meetings, regional and national meetings, field visits, emails and phone calls

Inputs: UK Plant Pathology Extension Specialists, research and extension funding

Date: Annual

Audience: Grain crop, forage, tobacco, and hemp producers, agribusiness and government agencies

Project or Activity: Programs that support soil fertility and soil management practices to improve crop production, reduce negative environmental impacts, and enhance overall profitability in a sustainable manner.

Content or Curriculum: Educational materials to include Publications, Fact Sheets, Newsletters, Workshops, Field Days, County Meetings, Regional Meetings, TV and Radio Broadcasts, Videos, Field Visits, emails and phone calls

Inputs: UK Soil and Crops Specialists, experts and interested parties

Date: Frequently to annual

Audience: Grain crop producers

Project or Activity: Grain Crops Management, including Corn, Soybean, Wheat, Barley, Rye, Canola and others

Content or Curriculum: Plant & Soil Science Grain crops specialists and other UK extension specialists with grain crops responsibilities.

Inputs: Plant & Soil Science Grain crops specialists and other UK extension specialists with grain crops responsibilities

Date: Annual, Frequent

Audience: Tobacco growers

Project or Activity: Tobacco production and research update meetings, field days, phone calls, and other consultations

Content or Curriculum: Program delivery, educational materials

Inputs: UK tobacco specialists

Date: annual

Audience: Agricultural producers and the public

Project or Activity: Pest and disease identification

Content or Curriculum: Clinical diagnoses and trainings

Inputs: PSS extension specialists assistance to diagnostic labs diagnostic services

Date: Frequently throughout the year

Audience: Tobacco growers

Project or Activity: Annual Tobacco Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) Training

Content or Curriculum: Educational materials (live trainings, virtual trainings, online video modules, supporting publications), program delivery

Inputs: UK Tobacco specialists, GAP Connections (administrator of GAP program), tobacco dealers and manufacturers

Date: Annual (25 per year)

Audience: Turfgrass managers, Extension agents, Public

Project or Activity: Turfgrass management including, but not limited to: sod farms, golf courses, sports fields, parks, cemeteries, and lawns

Content or Curriculum: Publications, Fact Sheets, Workshops, Field Days, County Meetings, Regional meetings, field visits, emails and phone calls

Inputs: UK extension associates and specialist, industry professionals

Date: Frequent throughout the year

Audience: Turfgrass managers, Extension Agents, Public

Project or Activity: Turf and Landscape Management Short Course

Content or Curriculum: Pesticide training, KDA test, and educational conference covering topics including: pesticide safety, weed control, disease management, professionalism, aquatic management, turfgrass physiology, selection, establishment, and management of turfgrass, water quality, soil physical and chemical properties.

Inputs: UK extension associates and specialist, nationally recognized turfgrass professors, and industry professionals

Date: annually

Audience: Hemp producers, potential hemp producers, hemp industry professionals

Project or Activity: Hemp Education

Content or Curriculum: Live trainings, virtual training, online videos, field days, supporting educational publications, program delivery, diagnostic support.

Inputs: UK Extension Specialists and Associates, ANR agents

Date: Annual and on-going

Audience: Forage and livestock producers

Project or Activity: Grazing Schools, Fencing Schools, Statewide Grazing Conferences, Statewide Hay and Stored Forage Conferences, Regional Forage Tours, Novel Endophyte Workshops

Content or Curriculum: Educational materials including proceedings, manuals, hands-on activities, demonstrations, and on-line materials including webpages, social media, and videos.

Inputs: UK Forage Extension Specialists (2), UK Master Grazer Coordinator (1), UK Master Grazer Interns (2), UK Forage Technicians and Research Associates (4)

Date: Programs are provided one or more times annually at multiple locations throughout Kentucky

Audience: Agricultural stakeholders (farmers, certified crop advisors, industry, others)

Project or Activity: Weed identification and management of grain and forage crops. Grain crops include corn, sorghum, soybean, small grains, and canola.

Content or Curriculum: Publications, Live and virtual trainings, online videos, workshops, field days, county meetings, regional and national meetings, field visits, emails and phone calls

Inputs: UK Weed Science Extension Specialists, research and extension funding

Date: Annual

Audience: Dairy Producers and Dairy Industry Professionals 

Project or Activity: Dairy Programming 

Content or Curriculum: University of Kentucky Publications, Other land grant university publications

Inputs: 

• Volunteers in agriculture.? 

• Research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system.? 

• Funding from local, state, and federal sources, and grants.? 

• Engagement of communities in identifying and implementing programming based on meeting local needs. 

• External stakeholder engagement and support such as commodity groups and agriculturalist organizations.?? 

Date: 

• Kentucky Dairy Conference (held annually in February) 

• Farm Visits and Questions related to dairy farming best practices (all year long) 

• Consult with Kentucky dairy boards, organizations, and others to carry out dairy programs in emerging topics (all year long) 

Audience: Swine producers

Project or Activity: Swine Production

Content or Curriculum: University of Kentucky Publications, Other land grant university publications

Inputs: UK and subject matter Specialists, Agents

Date: Farm visits and related questions related to specific best practices (all year long) 

Audience: Agents

Project or Activity: In-service updates / trainings 

Content or Curriculum: Online series, in-person trainings developed as needed 

Inputs: Coordination by AFS Personnel and Specialists 

Dates: Farm visits and related questions related to specific best practices (all year long) 

Audience: Sheep Producers, Industry Representatives, Agents 

Project or Activity: Ewe Profit Schools 

Content or Curriculum: Ewe Profit Curriculum 

Inputs: UK sheep facilities, AFS Personnel, and Specialists  

Dates: Farm visits and related questions related to specific best practices (all year long) 

Audience: Sheep Producers, Industry Representatives, Agents 

Project or Activity: Lambing school, grazing school 

Content or Curriculum: Course presentations & materials 

Inputs: UK sheep facilities, AFS Personnel and Specialists 

Dates: Farm visits and related questions related to specific best practices (all year long) 

Audience: Sheep Producers, Industry Representatives, Agents 

Project or Activity: Shearing & Hoof Trimming Schools 

Content or Curriculum: Course materials 

Inputs: UK Sheep facilities, AFS Personnel & Specialists 

Dates: Farm visits and related questions related to specific best practices (all year long) 

Audience: Sheep Producers 

Project or Activity: County-based sheep presentations 

Content or Curriculum: Presentation materials 

Inputs: UK Extension Specialists and Associates, ANR agents

Dates: Farm visits and related questions related to specific best practices (all year long) 

Audience: Sheep Producers, Agents 

Project or Activity: Small Ruminant Profit School 

Content or Curriculum: Presentation materials 

Inputs: KY Sheep & Goat Development Office 

Dates: On-line 

Audience: Sheep Producers, Agents 

Project or Activity: Advanced Small Ruminant Profit School  

Content or Curriculum: Presentation materials 

Inputs: KY Sheep & Goat Development Office 

Dates: On-line 

Audience: Agents 

Project or Activity: In-service updates / trainings 

Content or Curriculum: Online series, in-person trainings developed as needed 

Inputs: Coordination by IRM coordinators and Specialists 

Dates: Farm visits and related questions related to specific best practices (all year long) 

Audience: Beef Cattle Owners, Industry representatives, Agents 

Project or Activity: BQCA trainings 

Content or Curriculum: State BQCA videos and chute-side trainings 

Inputs: UK Extension Specialists and Associates, ANR agents

Dates: Farm visits and related questions related to specific best practices (all year long) 

Audience: Beef Cattle Owners, Industry representatives, Agents 

Project or Activity: Backgrounding Short Course 

Content or Curriculum: Backgrounding short course presentations & materials 

Inputs: UK beef facilities, Beef IRM coordinators and specialists, Industry sponsorships and External grant funds 

Dates: Every other year

Audience: Beef Cattle Owners, Industry representatives, Agents 

Project or Activity: Master Cattleman 

Content or Curriculum: Master Cattleman curriculum 

Inputs: Coordination with Beef IRM coordinators & specialists 

Dates: Every other year 

Audience: Beef Cattle Owners, Industry representatives, Agents 

Project or Activity: Bull Value Assessment Program (BVAP) 

Content or Curriculum: Publications, Fact Sheets, Workshops, Field Days, County Meetings, Regional Meetings, Field Visits, emails and phone calls

Inputs: UK Extension Specialists and Associates, ANR agents

Dates: Farm visits and related questions related to specific best practices (all year long) 

Audience: Beef Cattle Owners, Industry representatives, Agents 

Project or Activity: Post-weaning Value Assessment Program (PVAP) 

Content or Curriculum: Publications, Fact Sheets, Workshops, Field Days, County Meetings, Regional Meetings, Field Visits, emails and phone calls

Inputs: Coordination with Kevin Laurent & Maggie Ginn 

Dates: Farm visits and related questions related to specific best practices (all year long) 

Audience: Beef Cattle Owners, Industry representatives, Agents 

Project or Activity: Freezer Beef Short Course 

Content or Curriculum: Publications, Fact Sheets, Workshops, Field Days, County Meetings, Regional Meetings, Field Visits, emails and phone calls

Inputs: UK Extension Specialists and Associates, ANR agents

Dates: Farm visits and related questions related to specific best practices (all year long) 

Audience: Beef Cattle Owners, Industry representatives, Agents 

Project or Activity: Beef Bash 

Content or Curriculum: Publications, Fact Sheets, Workshops, Field Days, County Meetings, Regional Meetings, Field Visits, emails and phone calls

Inputs: UK Extension Specialists and Associates, ANR agents

Dates: Farm visits and related questions related to specific best practices (all year long) 

Audience: Beef Cattle Owners, Industry representatives, Agents 

Project or Activity: Artificial Insemination School 

Content or Curriculum: Publications, Fact Sheets, Workshops, Field Days, County Meetings, Regional Meetings, Field Visits, emails and phone calls

Inputs: UK beef facilities, local facilities and cattle, coordination with Beef IRM coordinator and Dr. Anderson 

Dates: Farm visits and related questions related to specific best practices (all year long) 

Audience: Beef Cattle Owners, Industry representatives, Agents 

Project or Activity: New Farmer Program 

Content or Curriculum: Publications, Fact Sheets, Workshops, Field Days, County Meetings, Regional Meetings, Field Visits, emails and phone calls

Inputs: UK Extension Specialists and Associates, ANR agents

Dates: Farm visits and related questions related to specific best practices (all year long) 

Audience: Ag and Natural Resource Agents  

Project or Activity: First Friday Equine Industry Update 

Content or Curriculum: Educational materials and program delivery 

Inputs: UK Specialists 

Dates: First Friday January – June, September - December 

Audience: Adult Horse Owners  

Project or Activity: Horses and Horsemen  

Content or Curriculum: Seminars on Best management practices   

Inputs: UK Specialist, ANR Agents Industry Professionals   

Dates: Farm visits and related questions related to specific best practices (all year long) 

Audience: Adult Horse Owners and Farm Managers  

Project or Activity: Horses and Horsemen / Pastures Please  

Content or Curriculum: Pasture Management practices  

Inputs: Extension Specialists ANR Agents and Industry professionals  

Dates: Farm visits and related questions related to specific best practices (all year long) 

Audience: Adult Horse Owners  

Project or Activity: Horses and Horsemen /Farm and Facility Expo 

Content or Curriculum: Farm related management practices  

Inputs: Extension Horse Specialist, ANR Agents and industry support   

Dates: Farm visits and related questions related to specific best practices (all year long) 

Audience: Livestock stakeholders (producers, lenders, government agencies, etc.) 

Project or Activity: Marketing related programming 

Content or Curriculum: Market outlook, risk management, value-added marketing, etc. 

Inputs: Extension faculty and staff, ANR Agents and industry support   

Dates: Farm visits and related questions related to specific best practices (all year long) 

Audience: Livestock stakeholders (producers, lenders, government agencies, etc.) 

Project or Activity: Management / profitability related programming 

Content or Curriculum: Managing cost of production and risk, long term decision making, production efficiency, etc. 

Inputs: Extension faculty and staff, ANR Agents and industry support   

Dates: Farm visits and related questions related to specific best practices (all year long) 

Audience: Agents

Project or Activity: In-service updates / trainings

Content or Curriculum: Educational materials and program delivery

Inputs: Coordination with ANR agents

Dates: Farm visits and related questions related to specific best practices (all year long) 

Audience: Poultry owners and Agents

Project or Activity: In-person multi-county workshops

Content or Curriculum: Educational materials and in-person delivery

Inputs: UK Extension Specialists and Associates, ANR agents

Dates: Farm visits and related questions related to specific best practices (all year long) 

Audience: Youth

Project or Activity: 4-H Plant and Soil Science Programs (e.g., 4-H Land Judging Contest, 4-H Homesite Evaluation Contest, 4-H Horticulture Contest)

Content or Curriculum: National and State-Level Research-Based, Vetted Publications, Curricula, and Educational Resources (e.g., Land Judging and Homesite Evaluation Publication, National Junior Horticulture Association Contest Manual)?

Inputs: 

• 4-H programs in agriculture in which youth experience a sense of belonging, developmental relationships, explore their spark, and are actively engaged in opportunities that are meaningful.

• Accredited volunteers in agriculture.

• Research base of the Cooperative Extension Land-grant system.

• Funding opportunities from the Kentucky 4-H Foundation, Inc.

• Funding from local, state, and federal sources, and grants.

• Engagement of volunteers and youth in delivering the programs and leading clubs.

• Engagement of communities in identifying and implementing programming based on meeting local needs.

• External stakeholder engagement and support such as commodity groups and agriculturalist organizations.?

Date: 4-H Program Year (September 1 – August 31)

Evaluation:

Adult

Outcome: Increased awareness of wildlife, forestry, and natural resources issues 

Indicator: 

• Number of participants who reported that they gained knowledge of wildlife. 

• Number of participants who reported they gained their awareness of forestry. 

• Number of participants who reported they gained their awareness of natural resources.   

Method: Survey (Self-Assessment of Learning Gains) 

Timeline: At program 

Outcome: Increased management to address resources concerns 

Indicator: 

• Number of participants who reported that they developed new management plans. 

• Number of participants who reported an increase in the acres managed. 

• Number of participants (or state agencies) who reported that they implemented wildlife damage management practices  

Method: Follow-up Survey (Survey previous participants) and tracking number of management plans implemented by state agencies 

Timeline: Annually 

Outcome: Increased understanding of invasive arthropod identification 

Indicator: 

• Number of learners that report knowledge gain in identification skills 

• Number of attendees that report knowledge gain in differentiating native and non-native arthropods (and close relatives) 

Method: In person survey  

Timeline: Immediately following Extension event 

Outcome: Greater understanding of reporting invasive species to appropriate agencies 

Indicator: 

• Number of people self-reporting knowledge gain on how to properly report a sighting of an invasive insect, arachnid, or mollusk 

• Number of people reporting behavioral changes in reporting and in support of invasive species monitoring methods 

Method: In person survey and year later survey 

Timeline: In person surveys at Extension event and digital surveys distributed one year later 

Outcome: Increased awareness of and use of safe/effective pesticide application methods 

Indicator: 

• Number of certified applicators attending continuing education credit Extension events (both private and commercial) 

• Number of people self-reporting knowledge gain on integrated pest management techniques  

• Number of people self-reporting behavioral changes regarding risk mitigation strategies for pesticide application 

Method: Surveys at CEU events 

Timeline:   Annually

Outcome: Improved skills related to safe food preparation and food preservation. (initial)

Indicator: 

• Number of individuals who reported increasing their knowledge, skills, or intentions regarding the safe storage, handling, preparation and/or preservation of food through Extension programs and resources.  

• Number of individuals who reported supplementing their diets with healthy foods that they grew, harvested, or preserved (e.g. community or backyard gardens, fishing, hunting). 

Method: Pre/post participant evaluations from: NEP agent-led curricula, Champion Food Volunteer, Food Preservation.

Timeline: Post-program/curricula survey administration; annual fiscal year (food system impact survey)

Outcome: Increased participation in Homebased Micro processing workshops. (initial)

Indicator: 

• Number of farms or food businesses who retained or expanded market opportunities and/or sales including locally produced foods. 

• Number of individuals who?attended certificate-based training?on food safety, food preservation, food processing, liability, and/or marketing. (This includes: PBPT, Produce Safety Alliance Training, Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) training, Value Chain Coordination Services Training, Farmers Market Sampling, Home-based Micro processing….). 

Method: HBM Post-Workshop Evaluation

Timeline: Annual (calendar year)

Outcome: Increase the number of partnerships and/or coalitions involved in promoting awareness of local food systems, health eating, and active living (e.g. Program councils, Health Advisory Boards, etc.). (initial)

Indicator: 

• Number of policy, systems, and/or environmental changes implemented within communities and organizations to promote active living, and healthy eating, including local food production and/or hunting/foraging and consumption (e.g. local food pantry can accept fresh foods or local game; starting/revitalizing a school or community garden; starting a walking club, etc.). 

• Number of individuals who were introduced to health food access points (e.g. farmers markets, CSAs, WIC, food pantries) through Extension programs or resources.

Method: Food Systems Impact Survey, planeatmove.com website data, NEP resources distributed;

Timeline: Annual, fiscal year (Food Systems Impact Survey);

Outcome: Short-term

Indicator:

• Number of participants who reported an increased knowledge of the dairy industry.  

• Number of participants who reported an increased knowledge of dairy management practices  

Method: Program evaluation survey 

Timeline: Immediate Post Program 

Outcome: Medium-term

Indicator: Number of participants who demonstrated/reported applying dairy management skills learned from UK Extension to their farm operations 

Method: Program evaluation survey or records from post farm visits and individual consultations 

Timeline: Throughout the Program Year 

Outcome: Long-term

Indicator: 

• Number of participants who reported a financial gain through using the skills learned in their dairy business. 

• Profit increase (dollars) reported by dairy businesses. 

• Number of participants who reported an improvement in their quality of life because of implementing the dairymanagement skills/practices learned from UK Extension 

Method: Program evaluation survey or records from post farm visits and individual consultations  

Timeline: End of program year or several years 

Outcome: Increased knowledge and awareness of raising pigs 

Indicator: 

• Number of participants who reported increased knowledge of management practices related to raising pigs. 

• Number of participants who reported that they intend to use the knowledge/skills gained from UK Extension to improve their swine management practices. 

Method: Program evaluation survey 

Timeline:  Annually

Outcome: Increased knowledge and/or awareness of management practices to improve sheep production efficiency 

Indicator: Number of participants who reported an increase in knowledge and/or awareness of best practices for managing/raising small ruminants. 

Method: Survey  

Timeline: Immediately after program participation. 

Outcome: Implementation or utilization of knowledge gained to make changes in management of small ruminant operation. 

Indicator: Number of participants that have made changes to improve management of their small ruminant operation. 

Method: Survey (post program) 

Timeline: Follow-up survey or records from individual consultations 

Outcome: Individuals gain financial management skills for small ruminant operations 

Indicator: Number of individuals that participated in small ruminant financial management programs. 

Method: Survey or records from individual consultations 

Timeline:   Annually

Outcome: Increased understanding of fiber production from sheep 

Indicator: Number of individuals that increased their knowledge of effective fiber production practices through participation in sheep shearing programs. 

Method: Survey  

Timeline:  Annually

Outcome: Gained knowledge and/or participated in direct marketing of lamb. 

Indicator: 

• Number of individuals that increased their knowledge of direct marketing of small ruminants. 

• Number of individuals who reported selling lamb directly to consumer/retailer. 

Method: Survey or records from individual consultations 

Timeline:  Annually

Outcome: Increased awareness of beef cattle quality assurance and care practices 

Indicator: Number of participants who obtained BQCA certifications 

Method: Post-program test 

Timeline: After program participation or online 

Outcome: Increased knowledge and/or awareness of management practices to improve cattle production efficiency 

Indicator: Number of participants who reported an increase in their knowledge and/or awareness of management practices for improving cattle production efficiency. 

Method: Survey  

Timeline: At the program 

Outcome: Implementation or utilization of knowledge gained to make changes in management of beef operation. 

Indicator: Number of participants who reported making a change to improve their beef cattle management practices. 

Method: Survey (post program) or records from individual consultations 

Timeline: 6-12 months after program 

Outcome: Increased Horse Management Knowledge 

Indicator: 

• Number of horse owners using Body Condition scoring to manage their horses. 

• Number of horse owners changing practices to reduce feed waste. 

• Number of horse owners using hay selection and use based on forage testing evaluation 

Method: Evaluation results and/or records from individual consultations 

Timeline: ongoing 

Outcome: Increased understanding of the horse industry  

Indicator: 

• Number of agent-led horse programing to their county programs. 

• Number of agents supporting Pastures Please and Farm and Facility Expo in their area. 

Method: Evaluation results and/or records from individual consultations 

Timeline: ongoing 

Outcome: Understanding of equine farm and facility sustainable management  

Indicator: 

• Number of participants implementing mud management practices. 

• Number of participants using temporary fences for grazing systems for horses. 

Method: Evaluation results and records from individual consultations  

Timeline: Ongoing

Outcome: Increased livestock marketing knowledge 

Indicator: 

• Number of participants who report increasing their knowledge of livestock marketing. 

• Number of individuals who implemented small ruminant financial management programs.

Method: Program evaluation tools/ surveys 

Timeline: Ongoing 

Outcome: Increased livestock management knowledge 

Indicator: Number of livestock producers indicating increased understanding of farm management. 

Method: Program evaluation tools / surveys 

Timeline: Ongoing 

Outcome: Increased awareness of and use of safe/effective pesticide application methods 

Indicator: 

• Number of certified applicators earning continuing education credit. 

• Number of participants reporting an increase in knowledge on integrated pest management techniques.  

• Number of participants reporting an increase in their use of risk mitigation strategies for pesticide application.  

Method: Surveys at CEU events 

Timeline:   Annually 

Outcome: Increased understanding of veterinary arthropod pest identification  

Indicator: 

• Number of participants that report knowledge gain in identification skills of arthropods. 

• Number of attendees that report behavior changes in pest monitoring. 

Method: In person survey  

Timeline: Immediately following Extension event  

Outcome: Increased knowledge and awareness of management practices to improve poultry production efficiency and food safety 

Indicator: 

• Number of participants indicating an increase in knowledge and/or awareness of poultry production 

• Number of participants who demonstrated/reported improved eggs and/or poultry cooking skills.

• Number of participants who increased their knowledge of the equipment and methods used in meat processing.

• Number of participants who reported an increase in knowledge of animal harvesting and carcass fabrication skills.

• Number of participants who reported an increased knowledge of egg and/or poultry food safety practices.

• Number of participants indicating an increase in knowledge and/or awareness of poultry production.

• Number of participants reporting an increase in knowledge on integrated pest management techniques.

Method: Survey

Timeline: At the program

Outcome: Improved production practices

Indicator: 

• Number of commercial participants who reported improving their plant production or management practices.

• Number of consumer participants who reported improving their plant production or management practices.

Method: Program evaluation tool/survey or records from individual consultations.

Timeline: After program participation.

Outcome: Stakeholders have knowledge and tools needed to better protect crops from diseases and understand the benefits of adopting best disease management practices and resistance mitigation. Stakeholders are more aware of UK plant pathology research

Indicator: Number of stakeholders who reported increased knowledge of research-based disease identification and management practices for crops grown in Kentucky and/or share that information with other stakeholders.

Method: Primarily surveys, records from consultations

Timeline: Annual

Outcome: Early identification of potential disease outbreaks

Indicator: 

• Number of stakeholders contacting Extension for help with disease identification and management.

• Number of plant samples submitted to the PDDL.

Method: Sample diagnosis through the PDDL, direct communication with Extension Specialists

Timeline: Annual

 

Outcome: Improved production practices and economic return of production inputs

Indicator: Number of participants who report increased economic return from improved production practices recommended in Plant Production and Management-related Extension programs.

Method: Surveys, participant feedback, CES agent feedback

Timeline: Frequently to annual

Outcome: Improved production practices

Indicator: Number of producers who reported increased knowledge of crop and forage production, fertility management, varieties, pest control, and/or sustainable practices.

Method: Surveys

Timeline: Annual

Outcome: Improved tobacco production practices, efficiency, and profitability

Indicator: Number of tobacco producers reporting increased economic returns, efficiency, or profitability after attending tobacco production meetings where improved production practices are presented at annual research update meetings.

Method: Surveys, views of research data published on Dark and Burley Tobacco Web pages, views of Dark Tobacco in Kentucky and Tennessee Facebook page, ANR agent feedback

Timeline: annual

Outcome: Identification of diseases and abiotic problems in crops and forages

Indicator: Number of plant diagnoses made annually with diagnosis and recommendation reports sent to ANR agent and grower.

Method: ANR agent feedback, grower feedback

Timeline: Annual

Outcome: Improved tobacco production practices, efficiency, and crop traceability

Indicator: 

• Number of tobacco producers participating in annual GAP Training.

• Number of tobacco producers reporting higher scores on annual third-party GAP Certification audits.

Method: GAP Training survey, Third-party GAP audit administered by GAP Connections, Views of research data published on Dark and Burley Tobacco Web pages, views of Dark Tobacco in Kentucky and Tennessee Facebook page

Timeline: annual

Outcome: Improved adoption of best management practices

Indicator: Number of turfgrass managers who reported that they gained knowledge of improved turfgrass management.

Method: Survey

Timeline: annual

Outcome: Improved adoption of best management practices and compliance with state regulations

Indicator: Number new applicator licenses awarded

Method: Survey and results from the KDA

Timeline: annual

Outcome: Improved knowledge base about the potential for hemp in KY

Indicator: Number of farms adopting/continuing hemp production.  

Method: Survey of program participants

Timeline: Annual and on-going

Outcome: Improving forage and livestock management

Indicator: Number of participants that indicate high likelihood of implementation of improved forage and livestock management practices.

Method: Schools, workshops, conferences, and field days.  Information from these events will also be pushed out through KY Forages YouTube Channel and Master Grazer Facebook page.

Timeline: Programs are provided one or more times annually at multiple locations throughout Kentucky

Outcome: Stakeholders have knowledge and tools needed to better protect crops from weeds and understand the benefits of adopting best management practices for weed and resistance mitigation. Stakeholders are more aware of UK weed science research

Indicator: Number of stakeholders who reported increased knowledge of research-based weed identification and/or weed management practices for crops grown in Kentucky.

Method: Primarily surveys, consultations

Timeline: Annual

Outcome: Increased crop management knowledge and skills?

Indicator: 

• Number of participants who increased their knowledge of risk management tools. 

• Number of participants who increased their use of risk management tools. 

• Number of participants who reported increased knowledge of plant production and/or management practices.

• Number of participants who reported reducing their inputs or costs in their plant production

• Number of participants who reported increased efficiency in their plant production and/or management

Method: Attendance and program evaluations / surveys

Timeline: Ongoing

Outcome:   Increase of community participation and awareness of environmental practices 

Indicator: 

• Number of home or community gardeners who reported that they implemented environmental stewardship (pollinator gardens, rain catchment, etc.)

• Number of non-commercial growers who reported adoption of improved management practices (soil sampling, reduced pesticide applications, integrated pest management, etc.)

• Number of community members using or participating in public or community gardens

• Amount of produce donated from community gardens

Method: survey

Timeline:   on going 

Outcome:   Awareness and implemented BMP into their farm or garden practices 

Indicator: 

• Number of commercial growers who reported improved specialty crop production and/or management practices.

• Number of non-commercial home gardeners who reported improved planting and/or management practices.

Method: survey    

Timeline:    on going 

Outcome:   Offer volunteer programs  

Indicator:  Increase horticulture volunteers

• Number of Master Gardener volunteers who completed training

• Number of Master Gardener volunteer service hours

• Number of clients engaged by Master Gardeners

• Number of programs led by Master Gardeners

Method: Offer  MG training program, invite individuals to become garden volunteer

Timeline:   on going  

Outcome: Increased awareness of wildlife, forestry, and natural resources issues 

Indicator: 

• Number of participants who reported that they gained knowledge of wildlife. 

• Number of participants who reported they gained their awareness of forestry. 

• Number of participants who reported they gained their awareness of natural resources.   

Method: Survey (Self-Assessment of Learning Gains) 

Timeline: At program 

Outcome: Increased management to address resources concerns 

Indicator: 

• Number of participants who reported that they developed new management plans. 

• Number of participants who reported an increase in the acres managed. 

• Number of participants (or state agencies) who reported that they implemented wildlife damage management practices  

Method: Follow-up Survey (Survey previous participants) and tracking number of management plans implemented by state agencies 

Timeline: Annually 

Outcome: Increased understanding of invasive arthropod identification 

Indicator: 

• Number of learners that report knowledge gain in identification skills 

• Number of attendees that report knowledge gain in differentiating native and non-native arthropods (and close relatives) 

Method: In person survey  

Timeline: Immediately following Extension event 

Outcome: Greater understanding of reporting invasive species to appropriate agencies 

Indicator: 

• Number of people self-reporting knowledge gain on how to properly report a sighting of an invasive insect, arachnid, or mollusk 

• Number of people reporting behavioral changes in reporting and in support of invasive species monitoring methods 

Method: In person survey and year later survey 

Timeline: In person surveys at Extension event and digital surveys distributed one year later 

Outcome: Increased awareness of and use of safe/effective pesticide application methods 

Indicator: 

• Number of certified applicators attending continuing education credit Extension events (both private and commercial) 

• Number of people self-reporting knowledge gain on integrated pest management techniques  

• Number of people self-reporting behavioral changes regarding risk mitigation strategies for pesticide application 

Method: Surveys at CEU events 

Timeline:  on going 

Outcome: Increased awareness of and use of Food Connection Programs: Value Chain Coordinators, TFC Learning Kitchen, and Cultivate KY resources. (initial)

Indicator: 

• Number of farms or food businesses who retained or expanded market opportunities and/or sales including locally produced foods. 

• Number of individuals who? attended certificate-based training on food safety, food preservation, food processing, liability, and/or marketing. (This includes: PBPT, Produce Safety Alliance Training, Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) training, Value Chain Coordination Services Training, Farmers Market Sampling, Home-based Microprocessing….). 

• Number of people who used Extension and/or Food Connection resources and/or services for pricing and/or marketing local foods (examples of services include: Kentucky Nutrition Education Program/KYNEP, PlateEatMove.com, Plate It Up Kentucky Proud!, Cook Wild Kentucky, Kentucky Value Chain Coordinators, Cultivate Kentucky Partnership, etc.). 

• Number of individuals reporting an increased awareness of how to find and prepare local food including responsible hunting/fishing/foraging. 

Method: Agent Tool level from The Food Connection (being developed); 

Timeline: Annual: Food System Impact Survey (federal fiscal year); The Food Connection (calendar year); HBMP (annual calendar year)

Outcome: Increased awareness and accessibility of Extension resources and programs supporting food access. (initial)

Indicator: 

• Number of individuals reporting an increased awareness of how to find and prepare local food including responsible hunting/fishing/foraging. 

• Number of policy, systems, and/or environmental changes implemented within communities and organizations to promote active living, and healthy eating, including local food production and/or hunting/foraging and consumption (e.g. local food pantry can accept fresh foods or local game; starting/revitalizing a school or community garden; starting a walking club, etc.). 

• Number of individuals who reported increasing their knowledge, skills, or intentions regarding nutrition and accessing healthy foods through Extension programs and resources. 

• Number of individuals who were introduced to healthy food access points (e.g. farmers’ markets, CSAs, WIC, food pantries) through Extension programs or resources.  

Method: Pre/post participant evaluations from: NEP agent-led curricula, Food Preservation, Champion Food Volunter Leader Training; the Learning Kitchen Participant follow-up eval. TBD; # of certified Champion Food Volunteers in each county;

Timeline: Post-program/curricula survey administration; annual fiscal year (food system impact survey)

Outcome: Improved skills related to safe food preparation and food preservation. (initial)

Indicator: 

• Number of individuals who reported increasing their knowledge, skills, or intentions regarding the safe storage, handling, preparation and/or preservation of food through Extension programs and resources.  

• Number of individuals who reported supplementing their diets with healthy foods that they grew, harvested, or preserved (e.g. community or backyard gardens, fishing, hunting). 

Method: Pre/post participant evaluations from: NEP agent-led curricula, Champion Food Volunteer, Food Preservation;

Timeline: Post-program/curricula survey administration; annual fiscal year (food system impact survey)

Outcome: Increased participation in Homebased Microprocessing workshops. (initial)

Indicator: 

• Number of farms or food businesses who retained or expanded market opportunities and/or sales including locally produced foods. 

• Number of individuals who attended certificate-based training on food safety, food preservation, food processing, liability, and/or marketing. (This includes: PBPT, Produce Safety Alliance Training, Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) training, Value Chain Coordination Services Training, Farmers Market Sampling, Home-based Microprocessing….). 

Method: HBM Post-Workshop Evaluation

Timeline: Annual (calendar year)

Outcome: Increase the number of partnerships and/or coalitions involved in promoting awareness of local food systems, health eating, and active living (e.g. Program councils, Health Advisory Boards, etc.). (initial)

Indicator: 

• Number of policy, systems, and/or environmental changes implemented within communities and organizations to promote active living, and healthy eating, including local food production and/or hunting/foraging and consumption (e.g. local food pantry can accept fresh foods or local game; starting/revitalizing a school or community garden; starting a walking club, etc.). 

• Number of individuals who were introduced to health food access points (e.g. farmers markets, CSAs, WIC, food pantries) through Extension programs or resources.

Method: Food Systems Impact Survey, planeatmove.com website data, NEP resources distributed.

Timeline: Annual, fiscal year (Food Systems Impact Survey);

Outcome: Short? 

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that they have identified their interest in natural resources.

• Number of youth who reported that they understand how their actions and choices impact natural resources and the environment.??? 

• Number of youth who reported that they understand natural resources concepts and ideas. 

• Number of youth who reported that have set goals to become a good steward of natural resources.

Method: Survey 

Timeline: Administered immediately following program/activity 

Outcome: Medium

Indicator: 

• Number of youth who reported that have applied the skills they learned in natural resources to other areas of their life, including at home, school and other programs.  

• Number of youth who reported that they have taken steps to conserve natural resources.  

• Number of youth who reported that they have used their skills and/or knowledge gained to complete a natural resources project.  

Method: Survey 

Timeline: Administered at end of program year/club year 

Outcome:  Long-Term 

Indicator: Long-term evaluation will be conducted using the National 4-H Index Study. 

Method: Survey 

Timeline:  Administered at end of program

Outcome: Youth Short Term Food Safety, Quality, and Access Outcomes

Indicator:

• Number of youth who reported that they learned the difference between healthy and unhealthy snacks. 

• Number of youth who reported that they learned about safe food handling and preparation.  

• Number of youth who reported that they learned about kitchen safety.  

• Number of youth who reported that they have identified an interest in Family Consumer Sciences. 

• Number of youth who reported an increased knowledge of egg and/or poultry food safety practices.

• Number of youth who demonstrated/reported improved egg and/or poultry cooking skills.

Method: Survey

Timeline: Immediate Post Program

Outcome: Youth Short Term Animal Production and Management Outcomes

Indicator:    • Number of youth who reported that they have realized the impact animal production has in daily life. 

• Number of youth who reported that they have an interest in animal production. 

• Number of youth who reported that they have identified at least one job/career in animal production and management that fits their interest.   

• Number of youth who reported that they understand animal production concepts and ideas.

• Number of adults in the county 4-H country ham program.

Method: Survey

Timeline: Immediate Post Program

Outcome: Youth Short Term Plant Production and Management Outcomes

Indicator    • Number of youth who reported increased understanding of the impact (or role) of plant production in their daily lives.

• Number of youth who reported an increased interest in plant production and management. 

• Number of youth who reported that they understand plant production concepts and ideas.

• Number of youth who reported that they have identified at least one job/career in plant production and management that fits their interest

Method: Survey

Timeline: Immediate Post Program

Outcome: Youth Short Term Sustainability, Natural Resources and Wildlife Management, and Environmental Outcomes

Indicator    • Number of youth who reported that they have identified their interest in natural resources.? 

• Number of youth who reported that they understand how their actions and choices impact natural resources and the environment.??? 

• Number of youth who reported that they understand natural resources concepts and ideas. 

• Number of youth who reported that have set goals to become a good steward of natural resources.? 

Method: Survey

Timeline: Immediate Post Program

Outcome: Youth Medium Term Food Safety, Quality, and Access Outcomes

Indicator    • Number of youth who reported that they applied skills and/or knowledge to prepare healthy snacks for self or family.  

• Number of youth who reported that they practiced safe food handling and preparation.  

• Number of youth who reported that they practiced kitchen safety. 

• Number of youth who reported that they have used the skills and/or knowledge gained to complete a Family Consumer Sciences Project. 

Method: Standard Evaluation Tool for Family Consumer Sciences: Survey

Timeline: End of the program year

Outcome: Youth Medium Term Animal Production and Management Outcomes

Indicator: • Number of youth who reported that they have used the knowledge and/or skills gained in agriculture to make informed decisions. 

• Number of youth who reported that they have taken steps to pursue gaining more knowledge for a job in animal production based on their interests.  

• Number of youth who reported that they used knowledge and/or skills gained in animal production to complete a project. 

• Number of youth who reported that they adopted/applied one or more animal production practices.  

Method: Survey

Timeline: End of the program year

Outcome: Youth Medium Term Plant Production and Management Outcomes

Indicator: • Number of youth who reported that they have used the knowledge and skills gained in plant production to make informed decisions. 

• Number of youth who reported that they have used the knowledge and/or skills gained in plant production to complete a project.

• Number of youth who reported that they have taken steps to pursue gaining more knowledge for a job in plant production based on their interests.

Method: Survey

Timeline: End of the program year

Outcome: Youth Medium Term Sustainability, Natural Resources and Wildlife Management, and Environmental Outcomes

Indicator: • Number of youth who reported that have applied the skills they learned in natural resources to other areas of their life, including at home, school and other programs.  

• Number of youth who reported that they have taken steps to conserve natural resources.  

• Number of youth who reported that they have used their skills and/or knowledge gained to complete a natural resources project. 

Method: Survey

Timeline: End of the program year

Outcome: Long Term

Indicator: Long-term evaluation will be conducted using the National 4-H Index Study.

Method: Standard Evaluation Tool for Family Consumer Sciences: Survey 

Timeline: 1+ years